IEMG vs. IEMS.L

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L).

IEMG and IEMS.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IEMG is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index. It was launched on Oct 18, 2012. IEMS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap. It was launched on Mar 6, 2009. Both IEMG and IEMS.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

IEMG vs. IEMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

IEMG vs. IEMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	4.55%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%
IEMS.L iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF	4.87%	19.35%	2.60%	23.28%	-18.98%	19.00%	18.41%	10.59%	-19.12%	34.91%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 4.55% return, which is significantly lower than IEMS.L's 4.87% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEMG having a 8.31% annualized return and IEMS.L not far behind at 8.26%.

IEMG

• 1D: 0.76%
• 1M: -6.83%
• YTD: 4.55%
• 6M: 7.62%
• 1Y: 33.51%
• 3Y*: 16.36%
• 5Y*: 4.53%
• 10Y*: 8.31%

IEMS.L

• 1D: 4.04%
• 1M: -2.82%
• YTD: 4.87%
• 6M: 6.29%
• 1Y: 28.58%
• 3Y*: 14.98%
• 5Y*: 6.87%
• 10Y*: 8.26%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. IEMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than IEMS.L's 0.74% expense ratio.

IEMS.L

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF

IEMG

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF

Return for Risk

IEMG vs. IEMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 84
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 84
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 84

IEMS.L

IEMS.L Risk / Return Rank: 80
IEMS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
IEMS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
IEMS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 77
IEMS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
IEMS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. IEMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IEMG	IEMS.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.70	1.58	+0.12
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.30	2.12	+0.18
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.31	+0.03
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.58	2.57	+0.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.84	9.74	+0.10
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEMG vs. IEMS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.70, which is comparable to the IEMS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and IEMS.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IEMG	IEMS.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.70	1.58	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.25	0.40	-0.15
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42	0.46	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.51	-0.22

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and IEMS.L is 0.67, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

IEMG vs. IEMS.L - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.63%, more than IEMS.L's 1.78% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.63%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%
IEMS.L iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF	1.78%	1.70%	1.81%	2.09%	2.47%	1.29%	1.62%	2.05%	2.19%	1.32%	2.08%	0.87%

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. IEMS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum IEMS.L drawdown of -49.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and IEMS.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEMG	IEMS.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.71%	-49.94%	+11.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.21%	-12.00%	-1.21%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.93%	-27.85%	-8.08%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.71%	-49.94%	+11.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-9.40%	-5.74%	-3.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.11%	-11.48%	-1.63%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.46%	2.86%	+0.60%

Volatility

IEMG vs. IEMS.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 9.35% compared to iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L) at 7.77%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IEMS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEMG	IEMS.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.35%	7.77%	+1.58%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.68%	12.78%	+1.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.79%	18.07%	+1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.91%	16.99%	+0.92%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.84%	18.08%	+1.76%