IEMS.L vs. EEMS
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS).
IEMS.L and EEMS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IEMS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap. It was launched on Mar 6, 2009. EEMS is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap Index. It was launched on Aug 16, 2011. Both IEMS.L and EEMS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IEMS.L or EEMS.
Key characteristics
| IEMS.L | EEMS | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 8.69% | 7.79% |
| 1Y Return | 15.72% | 14.06% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.03% | 2.59% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 10.49% | 10.65% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 4.69% | 4.69% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 1.19 | 1.04 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.96% | 13.28% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.93% | -48.89% |
| Current Drawdown | -0.64% | -1.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMS.L and EEMS is 0.70, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IEMS.L vs. EEMS - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IEMS.L achieves a 8.69% return, which is significantly higher than EEMS's 7.79% return. Over a longer period, both investments have demonstrated similar performance, with their 10-year annualized returns being quite close: IEMS.L at 4.69% and EEMS at 4.69%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IEMS.L vs. EEMS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMS.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than EEMS's 0.69% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IEMS.L vs. EEMS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L) and iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IEMS.L vs. EEMS - Dividend Comparison
IEMS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than EEMS's 2.38% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMS.L iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF | 1.71% | 2.09% | 2.47% | 1.29% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 2.08% | 0.87% | 1.65% | 1.67% |
EEMS iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF | 2.38% | 2.69% | 0.89% | 3.56% | 2.14% | 2.64% | 3.06% | 2.47% | 2.51% | 2.33% | 2.67% | 2.15% |
Drawdowns
IEMS.L vs. EEMS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMS.L drawdown since its inception was -49.93%, roughly equal to the maximum EEMS drawdown of -48.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMS.L and EEMS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IEMS.L vs. EEMS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L) is 3.59%, while iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small-Cap ETF (EEMS) has a volatility of 3.93%. This indicates that IEMS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEMS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.