PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMS.L vs. IAAAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IEMS.L vs. IAAAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L) and Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IEMS.L vs. IAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMS.L
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF
4.87%19.35%2.60%23.28%-18.98%19.00%18.41%10.59%-19.12%34.91%
IAAAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund
-3.55%21.45%17.37%20.04%-19.24%16.14%18.87%21.75%-11.48%20.17%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMS.L achieves a 4.87% return, which is significantly higher than IAAAX's -3.55% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMS.L has underperformed IAAAX with an annualized return of 8.26%, while IAAAX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.92% annualized return.


IEMS.L

1D
4.04%
1M
-2.82%
YTD
4.87%
6M
6.29%
1Y
28.58%
3Y*
14.98%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
8.26%

IAAAX

1D
2.97%
1M
-6.10%
YTD
-3.55%
6M
-0.47%
1Y
18.90%
3Y*
15.86%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
9.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IEMS.L vs. IAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMS.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than IAAAX's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IEMS.L vs. IAAAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMS.L
IEMS.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IEMS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

IAAAX
IAAAX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
IAAAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IAAAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
IAAAX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IAAAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IAAAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMS.L vs. IAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L) and Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEMS.LIAAAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.58

1.08

+0.50

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.12

1.59

+0.53

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.24

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.57

1.57

+1.00

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.74

7.22

+2.52

IEMS.L vs. IAAAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the IAAAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMS.L and IAAAX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEMS.LIAAAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.58

1.08

+0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

0.48

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

0.59

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.40

+0.11

Correlation

The correlation between IEMS.L and IAAAX is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IEMS.L vs. IAAAX - Dividend Comparison

IEMS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than IAAAX's 7.48% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEMS.L
iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF
1.78%1.70%1.81%2.09%2.47%1.29%1.62%2.05%2.19%1.32%2.08%0.87%
IAAAX
Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund
7.48%7.21%5.16%2.79%8.74%8.25%4.13%9.02%19.05%11.01%8.16%9.44%

Drawdowns

IEMS.L vs. IAAAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMS.L drawdown since its inception was -49.94%, smaller than the maximum IAAAX drawdown of -56.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMS.L and IAAAX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMS.LIAAAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.94%

-56.57%

+6.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.00%

-12.30%

+0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.85%

-29.29%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.94%

-35.34%

-14.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.74%

-7.17%

+1.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.48%

-9.59%

-1.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

2.67%

+0.19%

Volatility

IEMS.L vs. IAAAX - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Transamerica Asset Allocation Growth Portfolio Fund (IAAAX) at 6.16%. This indicates that IEMS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAAAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IEMS.LIAAAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

6.16%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

10.26%

+2.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.07%

17.97%

+0.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.99%

16.29%

+0.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.08%

16.79%

+1.29%