IEMS.L vs. BKEM
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM).
IEMS.L and BKEM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IEMS.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap. It was launched on Mar 6, 2009. BKEM is a passively managed fund by The Bank of New York Mellon Corp. that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Emerging Markets Large Cap Index. It was launched on Apr 24, 2020. Both IEMS.L and BKEM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IEMS.L or BKEM.
Key characteristics
| IEMS.L | BKEM | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 7.28% | 8.41% |
| 1Y Return | 13.11% | 12.73% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 2.08% | -2.71% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.97 | 0.92 |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.96% | 14.15% |
| Max Drawdown | -49.93% | -39.48% |
| Current Drawdown | -1.93% | -19.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMS.L and BKEM is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IEMS.L vs. BKEM - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IEMS.L achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than BKEM's 8.41% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IEMS.L vs. BKEM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMS.L has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BKEM's 0.11% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IEMS.L vs. BKEM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L) and BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IEMS.L vs. BKEM - Dividend Comparison
IEMS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than BKEM's 2.67% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMS.L iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF | 1.73% | 2.09% | 2.47% | 1.29% | 1.62% | 2.05% | 2.19% | 1.32% | 2.08% | 0.87% | 1.65% | 1.67% |
BKEM BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF | 2.67% | 3.02% | 3.15% | 2.22% | 1.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IEMS.L vs. BKEM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMS.L drawdown since its inception was -49.93%, which is greater than BKEM's maximum drawdown of -39.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMS.L and BKEM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IEMS.L vs. BKEM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI Emerging Markets Small Cap UCITS ETF (IEMS.L) is 3.90%, while BNY Mellon Emerging Markets Equity ETF (BKEM) has a volatility of 4.59%. This indicates that IEMS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKEM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.