IEMG vs. GNR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and GNR (SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while GNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEMG returned 9.88%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for GNR. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IEMG charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GNR.

Performance

IEMG vs. GNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 18.97% return, which is significantly higher than GNR's 15.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMG has underperformed GNR with an annualized return of 9.88%, while GNR has yielded a comparatively higher 10.53% annualized return.

IEMG

• 1D: 1.70%
• 1M: -3.66%
• YTD: 18.97%
• 6M: 20.80%
• 1Y: 40.80%
• 3Y*: 20.51%
• 5Y*: 6.57%
• 10Y*: 9.88%

GNR

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -2.80%
• YTD: 15.95%
• 6M: 20.08%
• 1Y: 37.42%
• 3Y*: 13.57%
• 5Y*: 9.11%
• 10Y*: 10.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	18.97%	32.56%	6.50%	11.52%	-19.98%	-0.64%	17.87%	17.81%	-14.92%	37.38%
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	15.95%	28.68%	-8.27%	2.95%	10.20%	24.73%	-0.03%	16.49%	-13.19%	22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and GNR is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2012	0.71

The correlation between IEMG and GNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.71 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IEMG vs. GNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IEMG	GNR
Technology	35.0%	-
Financial Services	18.4%	0.0%
Consumer Cyclical	9.5%	6.3%
Industrials	9.0%	0.2%
Basic Materials	6.9%	50.3%
Communication Services	6.4%	-
Energy	3.8%	37.6%
Healthcare	3.7%	0.0%
Consumer Defensive	3.3%	4.6%
Utilities	2.2%	0.0%
Real Estate	1.7%	0.8%

Return for Risk

IEMG vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG

IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 67
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 67
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 71
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 69

GNR

GNR Risk / Return Rank: 80
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 74
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IEMG	GNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	2.23	-0.24
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.58	2.86	-0.28
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.39	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	4.72	-1.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.68	18.00	-6.32
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IEMG vs. GNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is comparable to the GNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and GNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IEMG	GNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.99	2.23	-0.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.35	0.45	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.49	0.48	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.33	0.25	+0.08

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and GNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IEMG	GNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.71%	-51.37%	+12.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.21%	-7.97%	-5.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.21%	-21.15%	+3.94%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.75%	-25.66%	-10.09%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.71%	-48.59%	+9.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.00%	-5.04%	-1.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.97%	-14.94%	+1.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.50%	2.08%	+1.42%

Volatility

IEMG vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 10.33% compared to SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) at 5.49%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IEMG	GNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.33%	5.49%	+4.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.35%	13.73%	+4.62%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.62%	16.88%	+3.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.62%	20.30%	-1.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.14%	21.90%	-1.76%

IEMG vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

IEMG vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than GNR's 2.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	2.56%	2.76%	4.73%	3.37%	4.37%	3.44%	2.78%	3.84%	3.51%	2.40%	2.06%	4.59%
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF	2.31%	2.75%	3.20%	2.89%	2.71%	3.06%	1.87%	3.15%	2.76%	2.35%	2.28%	2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IEMG and GNR in my portfolio?

IEMG and GNR have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IEMG or GNR?

IEMG has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to GNR (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs GNR's -51.37%.

Which ETF is better, IEMG or GNR?

On 10-year performance, GNR leads with 10.53% vs 9.88% for IEMG. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, GNR has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IEMG or GNR?

Over the 10-year period, GNR has performed better with a 10.53% return vs 9.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IEMG or GNR?

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GNR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IEMG or GNR?

GNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.56%, compared with 2.31% for IEMG.

What is the main difference between IEMG and GNR?

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while GNR is Commodity Producers Equities. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.40% for GNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.