IEMG vs. DGS
IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) and DGS (WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund) are both Emerging Markets Diversified funds - IEMG tracks the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index while DGS tracks the WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEMG returned 10.41%/yr vs 9.93%/yr for DGS. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEMG charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.58%/yr for DGS.
Performance
IEMG vs. DGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than DGS's 14.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEMG having a 10.41% annualized return and DGS not far behind at 9.93%.
IEMG
- 1D
- -1.34%
- 1M
- 7.97%
- YTD
- 26.21%
- 6M
- 28.63%
- 1Y
- 52.58%
- 3Y*
- 23.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.58%
- 10Y*
- 10.41%
DGS
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- 2.58%
- YTD
- 14.53%
- 6M
- 15.57%
- 1Y
- 27.26%
- 3Y*
- 16.17%
- 5Y*
- 7.85%
- 10Y*
- 9.93%
IEMG vs. DGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 26.21% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 37.38% |
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 14.53% | 21.18% | 1.13% | 19.08% | -12.35% | 15.33% | 4.06% | 18.90% | -16.52% | 37.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMG and DGS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012 | 0.92 |
The correlation between IEMG and DGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEMG vs. DGS — Risk / Return Rank
IEMG
DGS
IEMG vs. DGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEMG | DGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.72 | 1.76 | +0.96 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.53 | 2.43 | +1.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.32 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 2.72 | +1.28 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.38 | 9.16 | +6.22 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEMG | DGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 1.76 | +0.96 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 | 0.53 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.58 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.35 | 0.23 | +0.13 |
Drawdowns
IEMG vs. DGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum DGS drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and DGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMG | DGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.71% | -61.83% | +23.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.21% | -10.06% | -3.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.21% | -19.31% | +2.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.83% | -24.86% | -10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.71% | -44.08% | +5.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.34% | -1.40% | +0.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.97% | -12.59% | -0.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.43% | 2.98% | +0.45% |
Volatility
IEMG vs. DGS - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) at 5.24%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEMG | DGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.31% | 5.24% | +3.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.93% | 13.03% | +3.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.43% | 15.56% | +3.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 14.87% | +3.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.03% | 17.32% | +2.71% |
IEMG vs. DGS - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DGS's 0.58% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEMG vs. DGS - Dividend Comparison
IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than DGS's 3.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DGS WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund | 3.21% | 3.45% | 3.36% | 4.55% | 5.34% | 3.98% | 3.69% | 3.95% | 4.24% | 2.81% | 3.42% | 3.28% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.18% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEMG and DGS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to DGS (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs DGS's -61.83%.
On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 10.41% vs 9.93% for DGS. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.
DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 2.18% for IEMG.
IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while DGS tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.58% for DGS.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEMG and DGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer