PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. DGS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. DGS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 26.21% return, which is significantly higher than DGS's 14.53% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEMG having a 10.41% annualized return and DGS not far behind at 9.93%.


IEMG

1D
-1.34%
1M
7.97%
YTD
26.21%
6M
28.63%
1Y
52.58%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
7.58%
10Y*
10.41%

DGS

1D
-1.37%
1M
2.58%
YTD
14.53%
6M
15.57%
1Y
27.26%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
7.85%
10Y*
9.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. DGS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
26.21%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%17.87%17.81%-14.92%37.38%
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
14.53%21.18%1.13%19.08%-12.35%15.33%4.06%18.90%-16.52%37.47%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and DGS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.92

The correlation between IEMG and DGS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. DGS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DGS
DGS Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
DGS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGS Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGS Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
DGS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGS Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. DGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEMGDGSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.72

1.76

+0.96

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.53

2.43

+1.10

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.32

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

2.72

+1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.38

9.16

+6.22

IEMG vs. DGS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the DGS Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and DGS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEMGDGSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

1.76

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

0.53

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

0.58

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

0.23

+0.13

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. DGS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, smaller than the maximum DGS drawdown of -61.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and DGS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGDGSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-61.83%

+23.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-10.06%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-19.31%

+2.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.83%

-24.86%

-10.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

-44.08%

+5.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.34%

-1.40%

+0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-12.59%

-0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.43%

2.98%

+0.45%

Volatility

IEMG vs. DGS - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund (DGS) at 5.24%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGDGSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

5.24%

+3.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.93%

13.03%

+3.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.43%

15.56%

+3.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.38%

14.87%

+3.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.03%

17.32%

+2.71%

IEMG vs. DGS - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DGS's 0.58% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEMG vs. DGS - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.18%, less than DGS's 3.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGS
WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Fund
3.21%3.45%3.36%4.55%5.34%3.98%3.69%3.95%4.24%2.81%3.42%3.28%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.18%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMG and DGS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to DGS (5.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs DGS's -61.83%.

On 10-year performance, IEMG leads with 10.41% vs 9.93% for DGS. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, DGS has been the lower-risk option at 5.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 10.41% return vs 9.93%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for DGS.

DGS has the higher dividend yield at 3.21%, compared with 2.18% for IEMG.

IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index, while DGS tracks WisdomTree Emerging Markets SmallCap Dividend Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.58% for DGS.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 1.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and DGS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer