PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. BKIE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. BKIE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 18.92% return, which is significantly higher than BKIE's 10.10% return.


IEMG

1D
2.71%
1M
-7.39%
6M
13.60%
YTD
18.92%
1Y
32.41%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
7.09%
10Y*
9.06%
ALL TIME*
6.29%

BKIE

1D
1.21%
1M
-0.14%
6M
8.23%
YTD
10.10%
1Y
22.36%
3Y*
16.37%
5Y*
9.86%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
14.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. BKIE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
18.92%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-0.64%49.27%
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
10.10%32.08%4.63%18.25%-13.60%13.75%34.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and BKIE is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.77

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2020

0.77

The correlation between IEMG and BKIE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEMG vs. BKIE - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEMG
BKIE

Technology

43.6%
11.7%

Financial Services

17.3%
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

7.7%
7.2%

Industrials

7.7%
17.9%

Basic Materials

5.8%
6.7%

Communication Services

5.6%
4.1%

Healthcare

3.2%
9.1%

Energy

3.0%
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

2.8%
6.3%

Utilities

1.9%
3.5%

Real Estate

1.5%
1.8%

Technology

IEMG
43.6%
BKIE
11.7%

Financial Services

IEMG
17.3%
BKIE
26.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IEMG
7.7%
BKIE
7.2%

Industrials

IEMG
7.7%
BKIE
17.9%

Basic Materials

IEMG
5.8%
BKIE
6.7%

Communication Services

IEMG
5.6%
BKIE
4.1%

Healthcare

IEMG
3.2%
BKIE
9.1%

Energy

IEMG
3.0%
BKIE
5.0%

Consumer Defensive

IEMG
2.8%
BKIE
6.3%

Utilities

IEMG
1.9%
BKIE
3.5%

Real Estate

IEMG
1.5%
BKIE
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. BKIE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

BKIE
BKIE Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
BKIE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKIE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKIE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
BKIE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKIE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. BKIE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEMGBKIEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.46

1.97

+0.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.96

7.54

+0.42

IEMG vs. BKIE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.41, which is comparable to the BKIE Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and BKIE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. BKIE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, which is greater than BKIE's maximum drawdown of -28.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and BKIE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGBKIEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-28.19%

-10.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-11.41%

-1.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-13.19%

-4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.61%

-28.19%

-5.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.79%

-1.15%

-6.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.90%

-4.90%

-8.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.08%

2.97%

+1.11%

Volatility

IEMG vs. BKIE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 9.46% compared to BNY Mellon International Equity ETF (BKIE) at 3.86%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BKIE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGBKIEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.46%

3.86%

+5.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.25%

13.08%

+8.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.16%

15.23%

+7.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.21%

16.17%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.26%

16.32%

+3.94%

IEMG vs. BKIE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than BKIE's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEMG vs. BKIE - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.27%, less than BKIE's 3.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKIE
BNY Mellon International Equity ETF
3.19%3.12%3.31%2.88%2.97%2.58%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.27%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMG and BKIE have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (9.46%) compared to BKIE (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs BKIE's -28.19%.

On 5-year performance, BKIE leads with 9.86% vs 7.09% for IEMG. On fees, BKIE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, BKIE has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BKIE has performed better with a 9.86% return vs 7.09%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BKIE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.

BKIE has the higher dividend yield at 3.19%, compared with 2.27% for IEMG.

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while BKIE is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net), while BKIE tracks Solactive GBS Developed Markets ex United States Large & Mid Cap USD Index NTR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and BNY Mellon. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.04% for BKIE.

BKIE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.48 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and BKIE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer