PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEMG vs. ADIV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEMG vs. ADIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEMG achieves a 18.97% return, which is significantly higher than ADIV's 4.50% return.


IEMG

1D
1.70%
1M
-3.66%
YTD
18.97%
6M
20.80%
1Y
40.80%
3Y*
20.51%
5Y*
6.57%
10Y*
9.88%

ADIV

1D
0.43%
1M
-2.41%
YTD
4.50%
6M
4.87%
1Y
14.36%
3Y*
15.97%
5Y*
5.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEMG vs. ADIV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
18.97%32.56%6.50%11.52%-19.98%-3.43%
ADIV
SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
4.50%21.86%14.47%12.28%-18.00%1.50%

Correlation

The correlation between IEMG and ADIV is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 30, 2021

0.87

The correlation between IEMG and ADIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEMG vs. ADIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEMG
ADIV

Technology

35.0%
25.5%

Financial Services

18.4%
32.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
16.3%

Industrials

9.0%
2.4%

Basic Materials

6.9%

-

Communication Services

6.4%
2.7%

Energy

3.8%

-

Healthcare

3.7%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.3%
4.7%

Utilities

2.2%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.7%
7.9%

Technology

IEMG
35.0%
ADIV
25.5%

Financial Services

IEMG
18.4%
ADIV
32.4%

Consumer Cyclical

IEMG
9.5%
ADIV
16.3%

Industrials

IEMG
9.0%
ADIV
2.4%

Basic Materials

IEMG
6.9%
ADIV

-

Communication Services

IEMG
6.4%
ADIV
2.7%

Energy

IEMG
3.8%
ADIV

-

Healthcare

IEMG
3.7%
ADIV
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

IEMG
3.3%
ADIV
4.7%

Utilities

IEMG
2.2%
ADIV
2.5%

Real Estate

IEMG
1.7%
ADIV
7.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEMG vs. ADIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEMG
IEMG Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
IEMG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEMG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEMG Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
IEMG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEMG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

ADIV
ADIV Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
ADIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ADIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
ADIV Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
ADIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
ADIV Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEMG vs. ADIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) and SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEMGADIVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.19

+0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.10

1.42

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.68

4.66

+7.03

IEMG vs. ADIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEMG Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the ADIV Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEMG and ADIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEMGADIVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.99

1.04

+0.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.36

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.38

-0.05

Drawdowns

IEMG vs. ADIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEMG drawdown since its inception was -38.71%, which is greater than ADIV's maximum drawdown of -31.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMG and ADIV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEMGADIVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.71%

-31.55%

-7.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.21%

-10.15%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.21%

-18.53%

+1.32%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.75%

-31.55%

-4.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.00%

-4.40%

-2.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.97%

-8.44%

-4.53%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.50%

3.09%

+0.41%

Volatility

IEMG vs. ADIV - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a higher volatility of 10.33% compared to SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF (ADIV) at 5.13%. This indicates that IEMG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ADIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEMGADIVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.33%

5.13%

+5.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.35%

11.02%

+7.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.62%

13.87%

+6.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

16.54%

+2.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

16.41%

+3.73%

IEMG vs. ADIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEMG has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ADIV's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEMG vs. ADIV - Dividend Comparison

IEMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.31%, less than ADIV's 2.88% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ADIV
SmartETFs Asia Pacific Dividend Builder ETF
2.88%2.77%4.83%4.55%2.98%13.85%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEMG
iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF
2.31%2.75%3.20%2.89%2.71%3.06%1.87%3.15%2.76%2.35%2.28%2.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEMG and ADIV have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IEMG has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to ADIV (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEMG dropped -38.71% vs ADIV's -31.55%.

On 5-year performance, IEMG leads with 6.57% vs 5.91% for ADIV. On fees, IEMG is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, ADIV has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, IEMG has performed better with a 6.57% return vs 5.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEMG is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for ADIV.

ADIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 2.31% for IEMG.

IEMG is categorized as Emerging Markets Diversified, while ADIV is Asia Pacific Equities. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Guinness Atkinson Asset Management. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IEMG and 0.78% for ADIV.

IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEMG and ADIV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer