IEMB.L vs. XUEM.L
IEMB.L (iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and XUEM.L (Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, IEMB.L returned 1.91%/yr vs 1.90%/yr for XUEM.L. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IEMB.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XUEM.L.
Performance
IEMB.L vs. XUEM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMB.L achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than XUEM.L's 2.60% return.
IEMB.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 0.29%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 2.29%
- 1Y
- 11.41%
- 3Y*
- 9.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
XUEM.L
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 2.60%
- 6M
- 3.18%
- 1Y
- 12.57%
- 3Y*
- 10.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.90%
- 10Y*
- —
IEMB.L vs. XUEM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMB.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.62% | 13.71% | 5.70% | 10.54% | -18.35% | -2.28% | 5.57% | 16.06% | -1.40% |
XUEM.L Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D | 2.60% | 13.58% | 6.08% | 10.88% | -19.42% | -2.38% | 3.07% | 15.18% | -0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMB.L and XUEM.L is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2018 | 0.95 |
The correlation between IEMB.L and XUEM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEMB.L vs. XUEM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IEMB.L
XUEM.L
IEMB.L vs. XUEM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEMB.L) and Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEMB.L | XUEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.06 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.50 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 3.22 | -0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 13.78 | -3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEMB.L | XUEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.52 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.21 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.28 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
IEMB.L vs. XUEM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMB.L drawdown since its inception was -32.08%, which is greater than XUEM.L's maximum drawdown of -29.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMB.L and XUEM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMB.L | XUEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.08% | -29.94% | -2.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.32% | -3.88% | -0.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.54% | -8.08% | +0.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.62% | -29.94% | +1.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.02% | -0.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -7.83% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 0.91% | +0.13% |
Volatility
IEMB.L vs. XUEM.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEMB.L) has a higher volatility of 2.57% compared to Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D (XUEM.L) at 1.66%. This indicates that IEMB.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XUEM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEMB.L | XUEM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 1.66% | +0.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.93% | 3.97% | +0.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.95% | 4.97% | +0.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.87% | 8.90% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 10.84% | -1.59% |
IEMB.L vs. XUEM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMB.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than XUEM.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEMB.L vs. XUEM.L - Dividend Comparison
IEMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than XUEM.L's 5.21% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMB.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.83% | 5.85% | 5.80% | 5.65% | 5.55% | 3.95% | 3.86% | 4.73% | 4.82% | 4.79% | 5.57% | 4.78% |
XUEM.L Xtrackers USD Emerging Markets Bond UCITS ETF 2D | 5.21% | 5.30% | 6.79% | 5.27% | 5.92% | 8.49% | 4.18% | 0.61% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, IEMB.L and XUEM.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XUEM.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XUEM.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IEMB.L.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IEMB.L and 0.25% for XUEM.L.
Find the right allocation for IEMB.L and XUEM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer