IEMB.L vs. SWDA.L
IEMB.L (iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and SWDA.L (iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - IEMB.L is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund managed by iShares, while SWDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index. Over the past 10 years, IEMB.L returned 3.32%/yr vs 13.08%/yr for SWDA.L. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEMB.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SWDA.L.
Performance
IEMB.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IEMB.L is traded in USD, while SWDA.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the SWDA.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEMB.L achieves a 1.62% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 9.81% return. Over the past 10 years, IEMB.L has underperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 3.32%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 13.08% annualized return.
IEMB.L
- 1D
- 0.41%
- 1M
- 1.01%
- YTD
- 1.62%
- 6M
- 2.22%
- 1Y
- 11.20%
- 3Y*
- 9.72%
- 5Y*
- 1.91%
- 10Y*
- 3.32%
SWDA.L
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- 9.81%
- 6M
- 11.17%
- 1Y
- 26.04%
- 3Y*
- 20.71%
- 5Y*
- 11.87%
- 10Y*
- 13.08%
IEMB.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMB.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.62% | 13.71% | 5.70% | 10.54% | -18.35% | -2.28% | 5.57% | 16.06% | -5.53% | 9.73% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 9.81% | 21.14% | 19.09% | 23.79% | -18.13% | 22.52% | 15.68% | 27.97% | -9.23% | 22.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEMB.L and SWDA.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2009 | 0.42 |
The correlation between IEMB.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (all time) to 0.59 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEMB.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
IEMB.L
SWDA.L
IEMB.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEMB.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEMB.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.41 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.41 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.58 | 3.02 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.73 | 13.29 | -2.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEMB.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.88 | 2.27 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.78 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 | 0.83 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 0.73 | -0.22 |
Drawdowns
IEMB.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEMB.L drawdown since its inception was -32.08%, roughly equal to the maximum SWDA.L drawdown of -33.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEMB.L and SWDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEMB.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.08% | -33.62% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.32% | -8.59% | +4.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.54% | -17.07% | +9.53% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.62% | -26.50% | -2.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.62% | -33.62% | +5.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.11% | -0.42% | +0.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.02% | -4.58% | -0.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 1.95% | -0.91% |
Volatility
IEMB.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IEMB.L) is 2.57%, while iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) has a volatility of 2.81%. This indicates that IEMB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEMB.L | SWDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.57% | 2.81% | -0.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.93% | 8.58% | -3.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.95% | 11.41% | -5.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.87% | 15.30% | -6.43% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.25% | 15.73% | -6.48% |
IEMB.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEMB.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEMB.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison
IEMB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, while SWDA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEMB.L iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.83% | 5.85% | 5.80% | 5.65% | 5.55% | 3.95% | 3.86% | 4.73% | 4.82% | 4.79% | 5.57% | 4.78% |
SWDA.L iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEMB.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for IEMB.L.
IEMB.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for IEMB.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.
Find the right allocation for IEMB.L and SWDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer