PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFS.L vs. MMS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEFS.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


IEFS.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.57%
YTD
5.78%
6M
8.60%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
8.37%

MMS.L

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFS.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFS.L
IEFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IEFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

MMS.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFS.LMMS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFS.LMMS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

Drawdowns

IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFS.LMMS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

Volatility

IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFS.LMMS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFS.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, IEFS.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEFS.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.

IEFS.L tracks MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFS.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFS.L and MMS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer