IEFS.L vs. MMS.L
IEFS.L (iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF) and MMS.L (Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Europe Equities funds - IEFS.L tracks the MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR while MMS.L tracks the MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. Both are passively managed. IEFS.L charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for MMS.L.
Performance
IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IEFS.L is traded in GBp, while MMS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the MMS.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
IEFS.L
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 1.57%
- YTD
- 5.78%
- 6M
- 8.60%
- 1Y
- 16.22%
- 3Y*
- 12.43%
- 5Y*
- 5.82%
- 10Y*
- 8.37%
MMS.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IEFS.L iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF | 5.78% | 24.40% | 2.35% |
MMS.L Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFS.L vs. MMS.L — Risk / Return Rank
IEFS.L
MMS.L
IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) and Lyxor MSCI EMU Small Cap (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (MMS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEFS.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.83 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEFS.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.52 | — | — |
Drawdowns
IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFS.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.02% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.91% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.84% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.40% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.02% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.40% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.84% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | — | — |
Volatility
IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFS.L | MMS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.72% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.99% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.59% | — | — |
IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than MMS.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEFS.L vs. MMS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither IEFS.L nor MMS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, IEFS.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IEFS.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for MMS.L.
IEFS.L tracks MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR, while MMS.L tracks MSCI EMU Small Cap NR EUR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFS.L and 0.40% for MMS.L.
Find the right allocation for IEFS.L and MMS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer