PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFS.L vs. SWDA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFS.L vs. SWDA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFS.L achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly lower than SWDA.L's 9.92% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFS.L has underperformed SWDA.L with an annualized return of 8.37%, while SWDA.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.05% annualized return.


IEFS.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.57%
YTD
5.78%
6M
8.60%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
8.37%

SWDA.L

1D
-0.25%
1M
5.16%
YTD
9.92%
6M
10.29%
1Y
27.16%
3Y*
17.83%
5Y*
13.02%
10Y*
14.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFS.L vs. SWDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFS.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
5.78%24.40%0.75%11.87%-13.35%12.21%7.23%20.36%-12.26%18.08%
SWDA.L
iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
9.92%12.64%21.11%17.59%-8.33%23.64%12.25%23.03%-3.78%11.78%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFS.L and SWDA.L is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2015

0.77

The correlation between IEFS.L and SWDA.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.77 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFS.L vs. SWDA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFS.L
IEFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IEFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

SWDA.L
SWDA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWDA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFS.L vs. SWDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) and iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFS.LSWDA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.28

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.51

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

4.13

-2.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

16.50

-10.68

IEFS.L vs. SWDA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the SWDA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFS.L and SWDA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFS.LSWDA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.66

-1.28

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.98

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.97

-0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.88

-0.36

Drawdowns

IEFS.L vs. SWDA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFS.L drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, which is greater than SWDA.L's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFS.L and SWDA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFS.LSWDA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-25.58%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

-6.55%

-3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

-18.50%

+6.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-18.50%

-7.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.02%

-25.58%

-5.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-0.25%

-2.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-3.49%

-2.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

1.64%

+1.14%

Volatility

IEFS.L vs. SWDA.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to iShares Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (SWDA.L) at 2.52%. This indicates that IEFS.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SWDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFS.LSWDA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

2.52%

+1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

7.30%

+2.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

10.23%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

13.30%

+1.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

14.50%

+1.09%

IEFS.L vs. SWDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than SWDA.L's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEFS.L vs. SWDA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFS.L nor SWDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFS.L and SWDA.L have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SWDA.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SWDA.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFS.L.

IEFS.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while SWDA.L is Global Equities. IEFS.L tracks MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR, while SWDA.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFS.L and 0.20% for SWDA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFS.L and SWDA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer