PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFS.L vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFS.L vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IEFS.L is traded in GBp, while GLD is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GLD values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFS.L achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's 3.30% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFS.L has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of 8.37%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 14.01% annualized return.


IEFS.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.57%
YTD
5.78%
6M
8.60%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
8.37%

GLD

1D
-0.73%
1M
-0.85%
YTD
3.30%
6M
4.87%
1Y
32.96%
3Y*
27.85%
5Y*
19.42%
10Y*
14.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFS.L vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFS.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
5.78%24.40%0.75%11.87%-13.35%12.21%7.23%20.36%-12.26%18.08%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
3.30%52.02%28.87%7.06%11.03%-3.24%21.15%13.37%3.87%3.05%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFS.L and GLD is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.11

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2015

0.04

The correlation between IEFS.L and GLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.03 (5 years) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFS.L vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFS.L
IEFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IEFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFS.L vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFS.LGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

1.86

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

4.66

+1.17

IEFS.L vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFS.L and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFS.LGLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.31

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

1.17

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.87

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.70

-0.18

Drawdowns

IEFS.L vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFS.L drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -41.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFS.L and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFS.LGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-41.89%

+10.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

-17.78%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

-17.78%

+5.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-17.78%

-8.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.02%

-22.78%

-8.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-16.88%

+14.48%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-13.21%

+7.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

7.10%

-4.32%

Volatility

IEFS.L vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) is 3.78%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 4.87%. This indicates that IEFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFS.LGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.87%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

21.80%

-12.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

25.31%

-13.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

16.72%

-1.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

16.23%

-0.64%

IEFS.L vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEFS.L vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFS.L nor GLD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFS.L and GLD have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IEFS.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IEFS.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

IEFS.L is categorized as Europe Equities, while GLD is Gold. IEFS.L tracks MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFS.L and 0.40% for GLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFS.L and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer