PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFS.L vs. LGUK.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFS.L vs. LGUK.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFS.L achieves a 5.78% return, which is significantly higher than LGUK.L's 4.84% return.


IEFS.L

1D
-0.28%
1M
1.57%
YTD
5.78%
6M
8.60%
1Y
16.22%
3Y*
12.43%
5Y*
5.82%
10Y*
8.37%

LGUK.L

1D
-0.49%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
4.84%
6M
7.37%
1Y
19.32%
3Y*
14.32%
5Y*
11.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFS.L vs. LGUK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IEFS.L
iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF
5.78%24.40%0.75%11.87%-13.35%12.21%7.23%20.36%-5.48%
LGUK.L
L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF
4.84%24.95%10.56%6.64%5.26%17.94%-12.15%20.11%-7.13%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFS.L and LGUK.L is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.67

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2018

0.73

The correlation between IEFS.L and LGUK.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFS.L vs. LGUK.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFS.L
IEFS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IEFS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank

LGUK.L
LGUK.L Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGUK.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFS.L vs. LGUK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) and L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFS.LLGUK.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.26

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.63

2.07

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.83

7.06

-1.23

IEFS.L vs. LGUK.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFS.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the LGUK.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFS.L and LGUK.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFS.LLGUK.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.84

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.52

0.53

-0.01

Drawdowns

IEFS.L vs. LGUK.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFS.L drawdown since its inception was -31.02%, smaller than the maximum LGUK.L drawdown of -33.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFS.L and LGUK.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFS.LLGUK.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.02%

-33.76%

+2.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.91%

-9.30%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.84%

-12.30%

+0.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.40%

-12.30%

-14.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-4.70%

+2.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-4.82%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

2.73%

+0.05%

Volatility

IEFS.L vs. LGUK.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Edge MSCI Europe Size Factor UCITS ETF (IEFS.L) is 3.78%, while L&G UK Equity UCITS ETF (LGUK.L) has a volatility of 4.32%. This indicates that IEFS.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LGUK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFS.LLGUK.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

4.32%

-0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.75%

12.48%

-2.73%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.72%

14.38%

-2.66%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.99%

13.85%

+1.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.59%

16.31%

-0.72%

IEFS.L vs. LGUK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFS.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than LGUK.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IEFS.L vs. LGUK.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IEFS.L nor LGUK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFS.L and LGUK.L have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGUK.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGUK.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IEFS.L.

IEFS.L tracks MSCI Europe SMID NR EUR, while LGUK.L tracks FTSE AllSh TR GBP. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IEFS.L and 0.05% for LGUK.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFS.L and LGUK.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer