PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFA vs. JSMD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFA vs. JSMD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 8.58% return, which is significantly lower than JSMD's 16.93% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has underperformed JSMD with an annualized return of 9.33%, while JSMD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.


IEFA

1D
-0.71%
1M
-1.77%
6M
4.73%
YTD
8.58%
1Y
19.92%
3Y*
15.19%
5Y*
8.55%
10Y*
9.33%
ALL TIME*
8.32%

JSMD

1D
-0.37%
1M
-2.82%
6M
9.06%
YTD
16.93%
1Y
21.86%
3Y*
14.51%
5Y*
7.87%
10Y*
12.94%
ALL TIME*
14.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFA vs. JSMD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
8.58%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%22.64%-14.14%26.57%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
16.93%9.25%15.08%26.81%-22.84%8.40%30.79%31.05%-4.73%24.46%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFA and JSMD is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 25, 2016

0.69

The correlation between IEFA and JSMD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEFA vs. JSMD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEFA
JSMD

Financial Services

24.2%
9.3%

Industrials

19.4%
22.1%

Technology

12.1%
27.7%

Healthcare

9.6%
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
9.0%

Basic Materials

6.5%
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

6.4%
2.4%

Communication Services

3.7%
2.7%

Energy

3.5%
1.0%

Utilities

3.5%

-

Real Estate

2.7%
2.9%

Financial Services

IEFA
24.2%
JSMD
9.3%

Industrials

IEFA
19.4%
JSMD
22.1%

Technology

IEFA
12.1%
JSMD
27.7%

Healthcare

IEFA
9.6%
JSMD
20.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IEFA
7.8%
JSMD
9.0%

Basic Materials

IEFA
6.5%
JSMD
2.6%

Consumer Defensive

IEFA
6.4%
JSMD
2.4%

Communication Services

IEFA
3.7%
JSMD
2.7%

Energy

IEFA
3.5%
JSMD
1.0%

Utilities

IEFA
3.5%
JSMD

-

Real Estate

IEFA
2.7%
JSMD
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFA vs. JSMD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

JSMD
JSMD Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
JSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
JSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
JSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFA vs. JSMD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IEFAJSMDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.29

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.18

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.74

1.48

+0.26

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.57

4.89

+1.69

IEFA vs. JSMD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.28, which is comparable to the JSMD Sharpe Ratio of 0.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFA and JSMD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IEFA vs. JSMD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum JSMD drawdown of -38.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and JSMD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFAJSMDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-38.98%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-14.86%

+3.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.76%

-24.01%

+10.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.41%

-32.18%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

-38.98%

+4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.79%

-5.98%

+3.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.64%

-7.42%

+0.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

4.48%

-1.44%

Volatility

IEFA vs. JSMD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is 3.99%, while Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF (JSMD) has a volatility of 5.96%. This indicates that IEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JSMD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFAJSMDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.99%

5.96%

-1.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.45%

17.45%

-4.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.64%

22.19%

-6.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.59%

23.07%

-6.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.01%

22.81%

-5.80%

IEFA vs. JSMD - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JSMD's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEFA vs. JSMD - Dividend Comparison

IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%, more than JSMD's 0.43% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.44%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%
JSMD
Janus Henderson Small/Mid Cap Growth Alpha ETF
0.43%0.54%0.76%0.44%0.40%0.28%0.24%0.32%0.53%0.30%0.36%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFA and JSMD have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JSMD has higher volatility (5.96%) compared to IEFA (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs JSMD's -38.98%.

On 10-year performance, JSMD leads with 12.94% vs 9.33% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IEFA has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, JSMD has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 9.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JSMD.

IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.43% for JSMD.

IEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JSMD is Mid Cap Growth Equities. IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while JSMD tracks Janus Small Mid Cap Growth Alpha Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Janus Henderson. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.30% for JSMD.

IEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.28 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFA and JSMD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer