IEFA vs. JEPQ
IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IEFA returned 15.52%/yr vs 17.64%/yr for JEPQ. Their 0.67 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IEFA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
IEFA vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 9.45% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 5.52% return.
IEFA
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- 6M
- 4.92%
- YTD
- 9.45%
- 1Y
- 17.75%
- 3Y*
- 15.52%
- 5Y*
- 8.55%
- 10Y*
- 9.38%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.38%
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -2.60%
- 6M
- 3.56%
- YTD
- 5.52%
- 1Y
- 17.19%
- 3Y*
- 17.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.50%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $895.79M | $960.37M | $950.39M | |
| $411.15M | $392.07M | $419.06M |
IEFA vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 9.45% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -2.81% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 5.52% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFA and JEPQ is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.69 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.67 |
The correlation between IEFA and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEFA vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFA
JEPQ
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFA
JEPQ
Industrials
IEFA
JEPQ
Technology
IEFA
JEPQ
Healthcare
IEFA
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
IEFA
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
IEFA
JEPQ
Basic Materials
IEFA
JEPQ
Energy
IEFA
JEPQ
Utilities
IEFA
JEPQ
Communication Services
IEFA
JEPQ
Real Estate
IEFA
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFA vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
IEFA
JEPQ
IEFA vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEFA | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.54 | 1.97 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 8.72 | -2.88 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEFA vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFA | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -20.07% | -14.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -8.82% | -2.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.76% | -20.07% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.78% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.00% | -4.71% | +2.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.63% | -3.37% | -3.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.02% | 1.99% | +1.03% |
Volatility
IEFA vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is 4.00%, while JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) has a volatility of 5.63%. This indicates that IEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFA | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.00% | 5.63% | -1.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.48% | 11.56% | +1.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.55% | 14.13% | +1.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 16.84% | -0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.02% | 16.84% | +0.18% |
IEFA vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEFA vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.41%, less than JEPQ's 10.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.41% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.80% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEFA and JEPQ have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JEPQ has higher volatility (5.63%) compared to IEFA (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, JEPQ leads with 17.64% vs 15.52% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 17.64% return vs 15.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.80%, compared with 3.41% for IEFA.
IEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.35% for JEPQ.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.23 vs 1.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEFA and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer