IEFA vs. IQLT
IEFA (iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF) and IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEFA is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while IQLT is a Quality Factor fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEFA returned 9.53%/yr vs 9.70%/yr for IQLT. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. IEFA charges 0.07%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IQLT.
Performance
IEFA vs. IQLT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with IEFA having a 11.62% return and IQLT slightly higher at 12.06%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IEFA having a 9.53% annualized return and IQLT not far ahead at 9.70%.
IEFA
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 11.62%
- 1Y
- 24.58%
- 3Y*
- 16.46%
- 5Y*
- 8.91%
- 10Y*
- 9.53%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.52%
IQLT
- 1D
- -0.81%
- 1M
- 1.15%
- 6M
- 6.98%
- YTD
- 12.06%
- 1Y
- 24.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.51%
- 5Y*
- 7.74%
- 10Y*
- 9.70%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $832.02M | $871.11M | $936.56M | |
| $80.44M | $83.91M | $72.09M |
IEFA vs. IQLT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 11.62% | 32.08% | 3.26% | 17.95% | -15.24% | 11.63% | 8.18% | 22.64% | -14.14% | 26.57% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 12.06% | 25.42% | 1.54% | 18.73% | -15.22% | 12.94% | 12.48% | 28.18% | -10.76% | 24.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEFA and IQLT is 0.97 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.97 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.97 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.95 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 15, 2015 | 0.89 |
The correlation between IEFA and IQLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
IEFA vs. IQLT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IEFA
IQLT
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Utilities
Energy
Real Estate
Financial Services
IEFA
IQLT
Industrials
IEFA
IQLT
Technology
IEFA
IQLT
Healthcare
IEFA
IQLT
Consumer Cyclical
IEFA
IQLT
Consumer Defensive
IEFA
IQLT
Basic Materials
IEFA
IQLT
Communication Services
IEFA
IQLT
Utilities
IEFA
IQLT
Energy
IEFA
IQLT
Real Estate
IEFA
IQLT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEFA vs. IQLT — Risk / Return Rank
IEFA
IQLT
IEFA vs. IQLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IEFA | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 2.30 | -0.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.15 | 9.18 | -1.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IEFA vs. IQLT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, which is greater than IQLT's maximum drawdown of -32.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and IQLT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEFA | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.78% | -32.21% | -2.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.50% | -10.38% | -1.12% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.76% | -13.18% | -0.58% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.41% | -30.24% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.78% | -32.21% | -2.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.64% | -0.81% | +0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.63% | -6.15% | -0.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 2.59% | +0.40% |
Volatility
IEFA vs. IQLT - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a higher volatility of 4.75% compared to iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) at 3.86%. This indicates that IEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEFA | IQLT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 3.86% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.63% | 12.95% | +0.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.69% | 15.13% | +0.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 16.57% | +0.06% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.03% | 16.77% | +0.26% |
IEFA vs. IQLT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than IQLT's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IEFA vs. IQLT - Dividend Comparison
IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.35%, more than IQLT's 2.38% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEFA iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF | 3.35% | 3.55% | 3.47% | 3.20% | 2.70% | 3.32% | 1.90% | 3.18% | 3.46% | 2.57% | 2.96% | 2.63% |
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF | 2.38% | 2.33% | 2.87% | 2.27% | 3.14% | 2.24% | 1.61% | 2.28% | 2.72% | 2.36% | 2.91% | 2.78% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, IEFA and IQLT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
IEFA has higher volatility (4.75%) compared to IQLT (3.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs IQLT's -32.21%.
On 10-year performance, IQLT leads with 9.70% vs 9.53% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IQLT has been the lower-risk option at 3.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, IQLT has performed better with a 9.70% return vs 9.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQLT.
IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.35%, compared with 2.38% for IQLT.
IEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IQLT is Quality Factor. IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.30% for IQLT.
IQLT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 1.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IEFA and IQLT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer