IQLT vs. ACWI

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

IQLT (iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF) and ACWI (iShares MSCI ACWI ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IQLT is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while ACWI is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI All Country World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IQLT returned 9.41%/yr vs 12.94%/yr for ACWI. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQLT charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.32%/yr for ACWI.

Performance

IQLT vs. ACWI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQLT achieves a 8.54% return, which is significantly lower than ACWI's 13.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IQLT has underperformed ACWI with an annualized return of 9.41%, while ACWI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.94% annualized return.

IQLT

• 1D: 0.61%
• 1M: 1.21%
• YTD: 8.54%
• 6M: 11.18%
• 1Y: 16.76%
• 3Y*: 14.30%
• 5Y*: 7.38%
• 10Y*: 9.41%

ACWI

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 5.48%
• YTD: 13.06%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 30.55%
• 3Y*: 21.49%
• 5Y*: 11.67%
• 10Y*: 12.94%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQLT vs. ACWI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF	8.54%	25.42%	1.54%	18.73%	-15.22%	12.94%	12.48%	28.18%	-10.76%	24.04%
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	13.06%	22.41%	17.45%	22.27%	-18.39%	18.66%	16.34%	26.59%	-9.19%	24.33%

Correlation

The correlation between IQLT and ACWI is 0.87, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.87
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.85
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.87
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2015	0.82

The correlation between IQLT and ACWI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQLT vs. ACWI - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQLT	ACWI
Financial Services	24.3%	16.1%
Industrials	17.3%	10.9%
Technology	11.6%	29.4%
Healthcare	9.8%	8.1%
Consumer Cyclical	8.1%	9.3%
Basic Materials	7.2%	3.7%
Consumer Defensive	6.0%	5.0%
Energy	5.9%	4.2%
Communication Services	4.3%	9.0%
Utilities	3.8%	2.6%
Real Estate	1.6%	1.8%

Return for Risk

IQLT vs. ACWI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQLT

IQLT Risk / Return Rank: 34
IQLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 32
IQLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 32
IQLT Omega Ratio Rank: 31
IQLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
IQLT Martin Ratio Rank: 41

ACWI

ACWI Risk / Return Rank: 71
ACWI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
ACWI Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
ACWI Omega Ratio Rank: 72
ACWI Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
ACWI Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQLT vs. ACWI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) and iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQLT	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	2.41	-1.24
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.72	3.31	-1.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.44	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.74	3.24	-1.50
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.63	14.58	-7.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQLT vs. ACWI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQLT Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the ACWI Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQLT and ACWI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQLT	ACWI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	2.41	-1.24
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.45	0.73	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56	0.76	-0.20
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.50	0.43	+0.07

Drawdowns

IQLT vs. ACWI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQLT drawdown since its inception was -32.21%, smaller than the maximum ACWI drawdown of -56.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQLT and ACWI.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQLT	ACWI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-32.21%	-56.00%	+23.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.38%	-9.73%	-0.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.18%	-16.55%	+3.37%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.24%	-26.42%	-3.82%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.21%	-33.53%	+1.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	0.00%	-1.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.22%	-8.61%	+2.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.72%	2.16%	+0.56%

Volatility

IQLT vs. ACWI - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF (IQLT) has a higher volatility of 4.99% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI ETF (ACWI) at 3.88%. This indicates that IQLT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACWI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQLT	ACWI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.99%	3.88%	+1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.98%	10.27%	+1.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.40%	12.77%	+1.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.45%	16.05%	+0.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.98%	17.11%	-0.13%

IQLT vs. ACWI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQLT has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than ACWI's 0.32% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQLT vs. ACWI - Dividend Comparison

IQLT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.14%, more than ACWI's 1.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACWI iShares MSCI ACWI ETF	1.37%	1.55%	1.70%	1.88%	1.79%	1.71%	1.43%	2.33%	2.18%	1.94%	2.19%	2.56%
IQLT iShares MSCI Intl Quality Factor ETF	2.14%	2.33%	2.87%	2.27%	3.14%	2.24%	1.61%	2.28%	2.72%	2.36%	2.91%	2.78%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQLT and ACWI in my portfolio?

IQLT and ACWI have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IQLT or ACWI?

IQLT has higher volatility (4.99%) compared to ACWI (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IQLT dropped -32.21% vs ACWI's -56.00%.

Which ETF is better, IQLT or ACWI?

On 10-year performance, ACWI leads with 12.94% vs 9.41% for IQLT. On fees, IQLT is cheaper at 0.30% per year. On volatility, ACWI has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IQLT or ACWI?

Over the 10-year period, ACWI has performed better with a 12.94% return vs 9.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQLT or ACWI?

IQLT is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for ACWI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IQLT or ACWI?

IQLT has the higher dividend yield at 2.14%, compared with 1.37% for ACWI.

What is the main difference between IQLT and ACWI?

IQLT is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while ACWI is Global Equities. IQLT tracks MSCI World ex USA Sector Neutral Quality Index (Net), while ACWI tracks MSCI All Country World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQLT and 0.32% for ACWI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ACWI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.41 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.