PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFA vs. FPXI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFA vs. FPXI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 8.85% return, which is significantly lower than FPXI's 34.41% return. Over the past 10 years, IEFA has underperformed FPXI with an annualized return of 9.22%, while FPXI has yielded a comparatively higher 12.89% annualized return.


IEFA

1D
-0.78%
1M
3.43%
YTD
8.85%
6M
11.45%
1Y
22.00%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
9.22%

FPXI

1D
-0.36%
1M
13.37%
YTD
34.41%
6M
33.60%
1Y
49.62%
3Y*
27.44%
5Y*
4.04%
10Y*
12.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFA vs. FPXI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
8.85%32.08%3.26%17.95%-15.24%11.63%8.18%22.64%-14.14%26.57%
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
34.41%26.37%12.62%9.56%-31.83%-15.73%71.50%33.69%-13.07%39.32%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFA and FPXI is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 10, 2014

0.70

The correlation between IEFA and FPXI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

IEFA vs. FPXI - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IEFA
FPXI

Financial Services

22.5%
5.0%

Industrials

20.1%
22.6%

Technology

10.8%
31.4%

Healthcare

9.5%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.0%
7.2%

Basic Materials

7.0%
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

6.6%
0.8%

Communication Services

4.4%
2.5%

Energy

3.8%
2.3%

Utilities

3.6%
0.9%

Real Estate

3.0%
0.6%

Financial Services

IEFA
22.5%
FPXI
5.0%

Industrials

IEFA
20.1%
FPXI
22.6%

Technology

IEFA
10.8%
FPXI
31.4%

Healthcare

IEFA
9.5%
FPXI
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

IEFA
8.0%
FPXI
7.2%

Basic Materials

IEFA
7.0%
FPXI
14.8%

Consumer Defensive

IEFA
6.6%
FPXI
0.8%

Communication Services

IEFA
4.4%
FPXI
2.5%

Energy

IEFA
3.8%
FPXI
2.3%

Utilities

IEFA
3.6%
FPXI
0.9%

Real Estate

IEFA
3.0%
FPXI
0.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFA vs. FPXI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

FPXI
FPXI Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FPXI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPXI Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPXI Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FPXI Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPXI Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFA vs. FPXI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFAFPXIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.75

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.35

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

3.38

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

11.66

-4.32

IEFA vs. FPXI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the FPXI Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFA and FPXI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFAFPXIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.13

-0.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

0.19

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.61

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.48

+0.03

Drawdowns

IEFA vs. FPXI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, smaller than the maximum FPXI drawdown of -55.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and FPXI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFAFPXIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-55.78%

+21.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-14.77%

+3.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.76%

-20.58%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.41%

-50.75%

+20.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

-55.78%

+21.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-0.36%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-20.26%

+13.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

4.27%

-1.26%

Volatility

IEFA vs. FPXI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) is 4.86%, while First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF (FPXI) has a volatility of 8.88%. This indicates that IEFA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPXI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFAFPXIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

8.88%

-4.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

19.74%

-7.32%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

23.42%

-8.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

21.57%

-5.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

21.18%

-3.88%

IEFA vs. FPXI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than FPXI's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEFA vs. FPXI - Dividend Comparison

IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, more than FPXI's 0.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPXI
First Trust International Equity Opportunities ETF
0.59%0.70%0.93%0.71%1.13%0.71%0.18%0.67%1.75%0.75%2.09%1.34%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.26%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


IEFA and FPXI have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPXI has higher volatility (8.88%) compared to IEFA (4.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs FPXI's -55.78%.

On 10-year performance, FPXI leads with 12.89% vs 9.22% for IEFA. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, IEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, FPXI has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 9.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FPXI.

IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.59% for FPXI.

IEFA tracks MSCI EAFE IMI Index (Net), while FPXI tracks IPOX International Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.70% for FPXI.

FPXI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFA and FPXI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer