PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEFA vs. BUFI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IEFA vs. BUFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEFA achieves a 8.85% return, which is significantly higher than BUFI's 4.92% return.


IEFA

1D
-0.78%
1M
3.43%
YTD
8.85%
6M
11.45%
1Y
22.00%
3Y*
16.72%
5Y*
8.07%
10Y*
9.22%

BUFI

1D
-0.31%
1M
1.83%
YTD
4.92%
6M
6.32%
1Y
12.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IEFA vs. BUFI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
8.85%32.08%-3.43%
BUFI
AB International Buffer ETF
4.92%16.50%-1.31%

Correlation

The correlation between IEFA and BUFI is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2024

0.96

The correlation between IEFA and BUFI has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IEFA vs. BUFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEFA
IEFA Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
IEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

BUFI
BUFI Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
BUFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUFI Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
BUFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUFI Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEFA vs. BUFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) and AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEFABUFIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.30

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.92

2.26

-0.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.34

8.98

-1.65

IEFA vs. BUFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEFA Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is comparable to the BUFI Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEFA and BUFI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEFABUFIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

1.53

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

1.50

-0.99

Drawdowns

IEFA vs. BUFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEFA drawdown since its inception was -34.78%, which is greater than BUFI's maximum drawdown of -7.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEFA and BUFI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IEFABUFIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.78%

-7.43%

-27.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.50%

-5.69%

-5.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.20%

-0.32%

-0.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.69%

-0.86%

-5.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.01%

1.43%

+1.58%

Volatility

IEFA vs. BUFI - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF (IEFA) has a higher volatility of 4.86% compared to AB International Buffer ETF (BUFI) at 2.20%. This indicates that IEFA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IEFABUFIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.86%

2.20%

+2.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.42%

7.05%

+5.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.96%

8.43%

+6.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.51%

9.15%

+7.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.30%

9.15%

+8.15%

IEFA vs. BUFI - Expense Ratio Comparison

IEFA has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFI's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

IEFA vs. BUFI - Dividend Comparison

IEFA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, while BUFI has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BUFI
AB International Buffer ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IEFA
iShares Core MSCI EAFE ETF
3.26%3.55%3.47%3.20%2.70%3.32%1.90%3.18%3.46%2.57%2.96%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, IEFA and BUFI move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

IEFA has higher volatility (4.86%) compared to BUFI (2.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IEFA dropped -34.78% vs BUFI's -7.43%.

On 1-year performance, IEFA leads with 22.00% vs 12.80% for BUFI. On fees, IEFA is cheaper at 0.07% per year. On volatility, BUFI has been the lower-risk option at 2.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IEFA has performed better with a 22.00% return vs 12.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IEFA is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for BUFI.

IEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.00% for BUFI.

IEFA is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while BUFI is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: iShares and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IEFA and 0.69% for BUFI.

BUFI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IEFA and BUFI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer