IEAC.AS vs. VT
IEAC.AS (iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IEAC.AS is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond Index, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IEAC.AS returned 1.02%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for VT. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IEAC.AS charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.
Performance
IEAC.AS vs. VT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IEAC.AS is traded in EUR, while VT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the VT values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IEAC.AS achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 13.94% return. Over the past 10 years, IEAC.AS has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 1.02%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.
IEAC.AS
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.34%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 2.23%
- 3Y*
- 4.59%
- 5Y*
- 0.07%
- 10Y*
- 1.02%
VT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 3.42%
- YTD
- 13.94%
- 6M
- 13.42%
- 1Y
- 27.87%
- 3Y*
- 17.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.10%
- 10Y*
- 12.39%
IEAC.AS vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEAC.AS iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 0.58% | 3.05% | 4.40% | 7.74% | -13.63% | -1.02% | 2.55% | 6.29% | -1.52% | 2.20% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 11.35% | 7.90% | 24.18% | 18.36% | -12.92% | 27.11% | 6.98% | 29.68% | -5.53% | 9.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IEAC.AS and VT is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2009 | 0.09 |
Over the past year, IEAC.AS and VT have become more correlated (0.33) than their long-term average of 0.09, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IEAC.AS vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank
IEAC.AS
VT
IEAC.AS vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IEAC.AS | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.43 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.77 | 3.99 | -3.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.68 | 16.79 | -14.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IEAC.AS | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 2.31 | -1.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.02 | 0.81 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 | 0.73 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.56 | +0.22 |
Drawdowns
IEAC.AS vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IEAC.AS drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -39.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEAC.AS and VT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IEAC.AS | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.26% | -39.93% | +22.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.65% | -7.01% | +4.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -2.65% | -20.47% | +17.82% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.26% | -20.47% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.26% | -33.61% | +16.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.99% | -0.37% | -0.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.73% | -5.54% | +2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.76% | 1.66% | -0.90% |
Volatility
IEAC.AS vs. VT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) is 1.15%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 2.64%. This indicates that IEAC.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IEAC.AS | VT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.15% | 2.64% | -1.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 9.10% | -6.43% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.02% | 12.12% | -9.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.42% | 15.04% | -10.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.34% | 17.07% | -12.73% |
IEAC.AS vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison
IEAC.AS has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IEAC.AS vs. VT - Dividend Comparison
IEAC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.33%, more than VT's 1.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IEAC.AS iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF | 3.33% | 3.29% | 3.39% | 2.51% | 0.84% | 0.81% | 0.84% | 1.10% | 0.98% | 1.52% | 1.66% | 0.90% |
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF | 1.64% | 1.82% | 1.95% | 2.08% | 2.20% | 1.82% | 1.66% | 2.32% | 2.53% | 2.11% | 2.39% | 2.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IEAC.AS and VT have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VT is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VT is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IEAC.AS.
IEAC.AS is categorized as Corporate Bonds, while VT is Global Equities. IEAC.AS tracks Bloomberg Euro Corporate Bond Index, while VT tracks FTSE Global All Cap Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IEAC.AS and 0.06% for VT.
Find the right allocation for IEAC.AS and VT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer