PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IEAC.AS vs. SEUC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IEAC.AS vs. SEUC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IEAC.AS vs. SEUC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IEAC.AS
iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF
-0.57%3.05%4.40%7.74%-13.63%-1.02%2.55%6.29%-1.52%2.20%
SEUC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
-0.17%3.03%4.21%4.17%-3.54%-0.27%0.22%0.79%-0.53%0.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IEAC.AS achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than SEUC.L's -0.17% return. Over the past 10 years, IEAC.AS has outperformed SEUC.L with an annualized return of 0.98%, while SEUC.L has yielded a comparatively lower 0.81% annualized return.


IEAC.AS

1D
0.40%
1M
-1.43%
YTD
-0.57%
6M
-0.34%
1Y
2.31%
3Y*
4.30%
5Y*
-0.22%
10Y*
0.98%

SEUC.L

1D
0.13%
1M
-0.55%
YTD
-0.17%
6M
0.33%
1Y
2.09%
3Y*
3.52%
5Y*
1.43%
10Y*
0.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IEAC.AS vs. SEUC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IEAC.AS and SEUC.L have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

IEAC.AS vs. SEUC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IEAC.AS
IEAC.AS Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
IEAC.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
IEAC.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SEUC.L
SEUC.L Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
SEUC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SEUC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
SEUC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
SEUC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SEUC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IEAC.AS vs. SEUC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) and SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IEAC.ASSEUC.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.84

2.12

-1.27

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.19

3.09

-1.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.46

-0.31

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

2.41

-1.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.58

11.01

-6.43

IEAC.AS vs. SEUC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IEAC.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.84, which is lower than the SEUC.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IEAC.AS and SEUC.L, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IEAC.ASSEUC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

2.12

-1.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.05

1.09

-1.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.38

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.77

0.44

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between IEAC.AS and SEUC.L is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IEAC.AS vs. SEUC.L - Dividend Comparison

IEAC.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than SEUC.L's 2.98% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IEAC.AS
iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF
3.37%3.29%3.39%2.51%0.84%0.81%0.84%1.10%0.98%1.52%1.66%0.90%
SEUC.L
SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
2.98%3.05%2.59%1.27%0.19%0.30%0.23%0.17%0.11%0.28%0.50%0.72%

Drawdowns

IEAC.AS vs. SEUC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IEAC.AS drawdown since its inception was -17.26%, which is greater than SEUC.L's maximum drawdown of -7.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IEAC.AS and SEUC.L.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IEAC.ASSEUC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.26%

-7.82%

-9.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.65%

-0.83%

-1.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.26%

-4.90%

-12.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.26%

-7.82%

-9.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-0.62%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.74%

-0.65%

-2.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.59%

0.18%

+0.41%

Volatility

IEAC.AS vs. SEUC.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core € Corp Bond UCITS ETF (IEAC.AS) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to SPDR Bloomberg 0-3 Year Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (SEUC.L) at 0.52%. This indicates that IEAC.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEUC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IEAC.ASSEUC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

0.52%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.90%

0.64%

+1.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.71%

0.98%

+1.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.34%

1.32%

+3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.30%

2.13%

+2.17%