IDX vs. EWM
IDX (VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF) and EWM (iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDX is a Indonesia Equities fund tracking the MVIS Indonesia Index, while EWM is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the MSCI Malaysia Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDX returned -4.99%/yr vs 2.29%/yr for EWM. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDX charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWM.
Performance
IDX vs. EWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDX achieves a -35.13% return, which is significantly lower than EWM's 4.46% return. Over the past 10 years, IDX has underperformed EWM with an annualized return of -4.99%, while EWM has yielded a comparatively higher 2.29% annualized return.
IDX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -4.80%
- 6M
- -37.48%
- YTD
- -35.13%
- 1Y
- -27.91%
- 3Y*
- -14.01%
- 5Y*
- -7.22%
- 10Y*
- -4.99%
EWM
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- 6M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 4.46%
- 1Y
- 22.47%
- 3Y*
- 14.14%
- 5Y*
- 6.20%
- 10Y*
- 2.29%
IDX vs. EWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | -35.13% | 13.83% | -9.75% | 1.98% | -9.40% | -2.59% | -7.45% | 6.26% | -10.46% | 19.24% |
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 4.46% | 15.74% | 19.46% | -3.61% | -6.00% | -7.40% | 3.12% | -1.41% | -6.28% | 24.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDX and EWM is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 20, 2009 | 0.59 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IDX and EWM has dropped to 0.36 - well below their long-term average of 0.59, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IDX vs. EWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDX
EWM
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Utilities
Healthcare
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Financial Services
IDX
EWM
Basic Materials
IDX
EWM
Consumer Defensive
IDX
EWM
Energy
IDX
EWM
Communication Services
IDX
EWM
Consumer Cyclical
IDX
EWM
Industrials
IDX
EWM
Utilities
IDX
EWM
Healthcare
IDX
EWM
Real Estate
IDX
EWM
-
Technology
IDX
EWM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDX vs. EWM — Risk / Return Rank
IDX
EWM
IDX vs. EWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDX | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.83 | 1.27 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.63 | 2.13 | -2.76 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.51 | 5.95 | -7.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDX vs. EWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, smaller than the maximum EWM drawdown of -89.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDX and EWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDX | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -63.14% | -89.19% | +26.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.52% | -10.61% | -33.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -46.73% | -21.31% | -25.42% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.25% | -22.76% | -28.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -59.11% | -43.81% | -15.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -56.00% | -7.68% | -48.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.03% | -31.74% | +6.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.48% | 3.78% | +14.70% |
Volatility
IDX vs. EWM - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) has a higher volatility of 8.35% compared to iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF (EWM) at 4.47%. This indicates that IDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDX | EWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.35% | 4.47% | +3.88% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.89% | 11.36% | +14.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.05% | 14.25% | +13.80% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.21% | 13.77% | +7.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.48% | 16.16% | +8.32% |
IDX vs. EWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than EWM's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDX vs. EWM - Dividend Comparison
IDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than EWM's 3.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWM iShares MSCI Malaysia ETF | 3.56% | 3.41% | 3.32% | 3.47% | 3.00% | 6.48% | 1.89% | 2.91% | 3.84% | 5.58% | 5.97% | 37.54% |
IDX VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF | 3.21% | 2.08% | 4.01% | 3.62% | 3.64% | 1.08% | 1.66% | 2.21% | 2.19% | 1.85% | 1.16% | 2.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDX and EWM have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDX has higher volatility (8.35%) compared to EWM (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDX dropped -63.14% vs EWM's -89.19%.
On 10-year performance, EWM leads with 2.29% vs -4.99% for IDX. On fees, EWM is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, EWM has been the lower-risk option at 4.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, EWM has performed better with a 2.29% return vs -4.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
EWM is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for IDX.
EWM has the higher dividend yield at 3.56%, compared with 3.21% for IDX.
IDX is categorized as Indonesia Equities, while EWM is Asia Pacific Equities. IDX tracks MVIS Indonesia Index, while EWM tracks MSCI Malaysia Index. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for IDX and 0.49% for EWM.
EWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDX and EWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer