PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDX vs. EMMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDX vs. EMMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDX achieves a -36.77% return, which is significantly lower than EMMF's 26.23% return.


IDX

1D
-1.60%
1M
-21.09%
YTD
-36.77%
6M
-37.78%
1Y
-27.09%
3Y*
-14.02%
5Y*
-9.23%
10Y*
-4.45%

EMMF

1D
-1.39%
1M
7.35%
YTD
26.23%
6M
27.33%
1Y
45.89%
3Y*
23.37%
5Y*
10.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDX vs. EMMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IDX
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF
-36.77%13.83%-9.75%1.98%-9.40%-2.59%-7.45%6.26%2.69%
EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
26.23%21.22%9.45%20.59%-13.47%5.97%9.25%2.30%-6.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IDX and EMMF is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2018

0.57

The correlation between IDX and EMMF shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDX vs. EMMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDX
EMMF

Basic Materials

25.2%
1.9%

Financial Services

25.1%
8.2%

Energy

12.5%
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

9.0%
4.4%

Communication Services

8.9%
6.6%

Industrials

7.4%
3.8%

Utilities

5.2%
2.0%

Technology

2.6%
32.9%

Healthcare

1.8%
0.3%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

0.5%
14.0%

Basic Materials

IDX
25.2%
EMMF
1.9%

Financial Services

IDX
25.1%
EMMF
8.2%

Energy

IDX
12.5%
EMMF
2.1%

Consumer Defensive

IDX
9.0%
EMMF
4.4%

Communication Services

IDX
8.9%
EMMF
6.6%

Industrials

IDX
7.4%
EMMF
3.8%

Utilities

IDX
5.2%
EMMF
2.0%

Technology

IDX
2.6%
EMMF
32.9%

Healthcare

IDX
1.8%
EMMF
0.3%

Real Estate

IDX
1.8%
EMMF

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDX
0.5%
EMMF
14.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDX vs. EMMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDX
IDX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
IDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
IDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDX Martin Ratio Rank: 00
Martin Ratio Rank

EMMF
EMMF Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
EMMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
EMMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDX vs. EMMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) and WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDXEMMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.86

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.81

1.52

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.69

4.34

-5.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-2.07

17.88

-19.96

IDX vs. EMMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDX Sharpe Ratio is -1.08, which is lower than the EMMF Sharpe Ratio of 2.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDX and EMMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDXEMMFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.08

2.77

-3.86

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.45

0.73

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.14

0.53

-0.39

Drawdowns

IDX vs. EMMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDX drawdown since its inception was -63.14%, which is greater than EMMF's maximum drawdown of -32.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDX and EMMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDXEMMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.14%

-32.57%

-30.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-39.41%

-10.62%

-28.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-41.82%

-16.02%

-25.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.77%

-24.99%

-21.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-57.11%

-2.58%

-54.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-24.83%

-7.45%

-17.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

13.07%

2.57%

+10.50%

Volatility

IDX vs. EMMF - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF (IDX) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund (EMMF) at 7.26%. This indicates that IDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDXEMMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.31%

7.26%

+1.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.03%

14.55%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.08%

16.64%

+8.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.43%

14.39%

+6.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.31%

16.62%

+7.69%

IDX vs. EMMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDX has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than EMMF's 0.48% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDX vs. EMMF - Dividend Comparison

IDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, more than EMMF's 1.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMMF
WisdomTree Emerging Markets Multifactor Fund
1.87%2.45%1.30%1.62%3.48%2.64%1.93%2.93%0.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDX
VanEck Vectors Indonesia Index ETF
3.29%2.08%4.01%3.62%3.64%1.08%1.66%2.21%2.19%1.85%1.16%2.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDX and EMMF have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDX has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to EMMF (7.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDX dropped -63.14% vs EMMF's -32.57%.

On 5-year performance, EMMF leads with 10.50% vs -9.23% for IDX. On fees, EMMF is cheaper at 0.48% per year. On volatility, EMMF has been the lower-risk option at 7.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, EMMF has performed better with a 10.50% return vs -9.23%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EMMF is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for IDX.

IDX has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 1.87% for EMMF.

They also come from different issuers: VanEck and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for IDX and 0.48% for EMMF.

EMMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.77 vs -1.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDX and EMMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer