IDVZ vs. IDEV
IDVZ (Opal International Dividend Income ETF) and IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. IDVZ is actively managed, while IDEV is passively managed. Over the past year, IDVZ returned 22.54% vs 23.20% for IDEV. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDVZ charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for IDEV.
Performance
IDVZ vs. IDEV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDVZ achieves a 9.70% return, which is significantly higher than IDEV's 8.92% return.
IDVZ
- 1D
- -0.98%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 9.70%
- 6M
- 12.20%
- 1Y
- 22.54%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDEV
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 3.23%
- YTD
- 8.92%
- 6M
- 11.57%
- 1Y
- 23.20%
- 3Y*
- 17.40%
- 5Y*
- 8.48%
- 10Y*
- —
IDVZ vs. IDEV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
IDVZ Opal International Dividend Income ETF | 9.70% | 33.14% | -1.61% |
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 8.92% | 32.56% | -0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDVZ and IDEV is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2024 | 0.83 |
The correlation between IDVZ and IDEV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDVZ vs. IDEV — Risk / Return Rank
IDVZ
IDEV
IDVZ vs. IDEV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) and iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDVZ | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.42 | 2.08 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 8.16 | +1.53 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDVZ | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.90 | 1.61 | +0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.52 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.02 | 0.55 | +1.47 |
Drawdowns
IDVZ vs. IDEV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDVZ drawdown since its inception was -10.99%, smaller than the maximum IDEV drawdown of -34.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDVZ and IDEV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDVZ | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.99% | -34.77% | +23.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.35% | -11.20% | +1.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -13.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.46% | -0.98% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.40% | -6.57% | +5.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.33% | 2.85% | -0.52% |
Volatility
IDVZ vs. IDEV - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Opal International Dividend Income ETF (IDVZ) is 3.88%, while iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) has a volatility of 4.60%. This indicates that IDVZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDEV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDVZ | IDEV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.88% | 4.60% | -0.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.62% | 12.10% | -2.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.95% | 14.51% | -2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 16.26% | -1.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.48% | 17.27% | -2.79% |
IDVZ vs. IDEV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDVZ has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than IDEV's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDVZ vs. IDEV - Dividend Comparison
IDVZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%, less than IDEV's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.13% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% |
IDVZ Opal International Dividend Income ETF | 2.76% | 2.88% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDVZ and IDEV have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDEV has higher volatility (4.60%) compared to IDVZ (3.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDVZ dropped -10.99% vs IDEV's -34.77%.
On 1-year performance, IDEV leads with 23.20% vs 22.54% for IDVZ. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDVZ has been the lower-risk option at 3.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 23.20% return vs 22.54%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for IDVZ.
IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.13%, compared with 2.76% for IDVZ.
They also come from different issuers: TrueMark Investments and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for IDVZ and 0.05% for IDEV.
IDVZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.90 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDVZ and IDEV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer