IDV vs. FLTW

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

IDV (iShares International Select Dividend ETF) and FLTW (Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDV is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while FLTW is a Asia Pacific Equities fund tracking the FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDV returned 12.17%/yr vs 20.89%/yr for FLTW. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDV charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for FLTW.

Performance

IDV vs. FLTW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDV achieves a 13.60% return, which is significantly lower than FLTW's 65.68% return.

IDV

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 13.60%
• 6M: 15.83%
• 1Y: 35.03%
• 3Y*: 25.11%
• 5Y*: 12.17%
• 10Y*: 10.92%

FLTW

• 1D: 0.59%
• 1M: 9.23%
• YTD: 65.68%
• 6M: 71.97%
• 1Y: 100.51%
• 3Y*: 39.63%
• 5Y*: 20.89%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDV vs. FLTW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF	13.60%	52.16%	4.00%	10.32%	-6.40%	12.00%	-5.94%	23.56%	-10.37%	2.16%
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	65.68%	32.00%	16.68%	30.05%	-27.51%	29.46%	29.77%	31.23%	-9.32%	-1.28%

Correlation

The correlation between IDV and FLTW is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.54
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.53
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2017	0.58

The correlation between IDV and FLTW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDV vs. FLTW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDV	FLTW
Financial Services	30.1%	12.6%
Energy	15.6%	0.1%
Utilities	11.8%	-
Communication Services	10.0%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	9.6%	1.7%
Consumer Defensive	7.2%	0.9%
Industrials	6.7%	4.0%
Basic Materials	5.8%	2.9%
Real Estate	2.4%	-
Technology	0.9%	75.6%
Healthcare	-	0.6%

Return for Risk

IDV vs. FLTW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDV

IDV Risk / Return Rank: 88
IDV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
IDV Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
IDV Omega Ratio Rank: 89
IDV Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
IDV Martin Ratio Rank: 85

FLTW

FLTW Risk / Return Rank: 95
FLTW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
FLTW Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FLTW Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FLTW Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FLTW Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDV vs. FLTW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) and Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDV	FLTW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	3.62	-0.92
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.52	4.02	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.49	1.58	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.13	9.29	-5.16
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.32	27.95	-12.63

IDV vs. FLTW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDV Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the FLTW Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDV and FLTW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDV vs. FLTW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDV drawdown since its inception was -70.14%, which is greater than FLTW's maximum drawdown of -38.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDV and FLTW.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDV	FLTW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-70.14%	-38.00%	-32.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.52%	-10.87%	+2.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.86%	-26.45%	+14.59%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.19%	-38.00%	+8.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-42.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.70%	-4.47%	+2.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.38%	-8.42%	-6.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.30%	3.61%	-1.31%

Volatility

IDV vs. FLTW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares International Select Dividend ETF (IDV) is 4.24%, while Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF (FLTW) has a volatility of 15.27%. This indicates that IDV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLTW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDV	FLTW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.24%	15.27%	-11.03%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.88%	23.85%	-12.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.10%	27.98%	-14.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.58%	22.90%	-7.32%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.92%	22.03%	-4.11%

IDV vs. FLTW - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDV has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than FLTW's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDV vs. FLTW - Dividend Comparison

IDV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.40%, more than FLTW's 1.51% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FLTW Franklin FTSE Taiwan ETF	1.51%	2.51%	1.89%	2.85%	3.16%	2.31%	2.14%	3.00%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
IDV iShares International Select Dividend ETF	4.40%	4.94%	6.46%	6.51%	7.33%	5.78%	5.47%	5.15%	5.93%	4.52%	4.69%	5.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDV and FLTW in my portfolio?

IDV and FLTW have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDV or FLTW?

FLTW has higher volatility (15.27%) compared to IDV (4.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDV dropped -70.14% vs FLTW's -38.00%.

Which ETF is better, IDV or FLTW?

On 5-year performance, FLTW leads with 20.89% vs 12.17% for IDV. On fees, FLTW is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, IDV has been the lower-risk option at 4.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDV or FLTW?

Over the 5-year period, FLTW has performed better with a 20.89% return vs 12.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDV or FLTW?

FLTW is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for IDV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDV or FLTW?

IDV has the higher dividend yield at 4.40%, compared with 1.51% for FLTW.

What is the main difference between IDV and FLTW?

IDV is categorized as Global Equities, while FLTW is Asia Pacific Equities. IDV tracks Dow Jones EPAC Select Dividend, while FLTW tracks FTSE Taiwan RIC Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for IDV and 0.19% for FLTW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FLTW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.