PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDU vs. POWR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDU vs. POWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (IDU) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDU achieves a 3.25% return, which is significantly lower than POWR's 18.65% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IDU having a 8.80% annualized return and POWR not far behind at 8.59%.


IDU

1D
0.60%
1M
-4.84%
YTD
3.25%
6M
1.90%
1Y
9.25%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
9.17%
10Y*
8.80%

POWR

1D
0.11%
1M
-1.35%
YTD
18.65%
6M
14.89%
1Y
30.95%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
15.19%
10Y*
8.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDU vs. POWR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDU
iShares U.S. Utilities ETF
3.25%15.23%23.23%-5.02%0.17%16.96%-1.07%24.21%3.93%11.94%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF
18.65%10.81%-1.30%3.66%42.54%42.03%-28.30%8.44%-11.74%9.69%

Correlation

The correlation between IDU and POWR is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.39

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.30

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2012

0.24

The correlation between IDU and POWR shifts across timeframes, from 0.22 (10 years) to 0.39 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDU vs. POWR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDU
POWR

Utilities

90.3%
52.8%

Industrials

8.8%
26.6%

Energy

0.5%
17.3%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

2.9%

Utilities

IDU
90.3%
POWR
52.8%

Industrials

IDU
8.8%
POWR
26.6%

Energy

IDU
0.5%
POWR
17.3%

Basic Materials

IDU

-

POWR
1.0%

Communication Services

IDU

-

POWR

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDU

-

POWR

-

Consumer Defensive

IDU

-

POWR

-

Financial Services

IDU

-

POWR

-

Healthcare

IDU

-

POWR

-

Real Estate

IDU

-

POWR

-

Technology

IDU

-

POWR
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDU vs. POWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDU
IDU Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
IDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDU Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
IDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDU Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

POWR
POWR Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
POWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
POWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
POWR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
POWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
POWR Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDU vs. POWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (IDU) and iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDUPOWRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.32

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.01

5.20

-4.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.38

13.06

-10.67

IDU vs. POWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDU Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the POWR Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDU and POWR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDUPOWRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

1.88

-1.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.66

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.34

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.19

+0.23

Drawdowns

IDU vs. POWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDU drawdown since its inception was -53.88%, smaller than the maximum POWR drawdown of -65.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDU and POWR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDUPOWRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.88%

-65.98%

+12.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.15%

-5.98%

-3.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.74%

-23.14%

+6.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.11%

-25.09%

+0.98%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.18%

-63.42%

+27.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.30%

-1.35%

-5.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.38%

-18.15%

+6.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

2.38%

+1.51%

Volatility

IDU vs. POWR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares U.S. Utilities ETF (IDU) is 5.11%, while iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF (POWR) has a volatility of 5.77%. This indicates that IDU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than POWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDUPOWRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.11%

5.77%

-0.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.94%

12.34%

-1.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.80%

16.63%

-2.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.49%

23.08%

-6.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.72%

25.61%

-6.89%

IDU vs. POWR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDU has a 0.42% expense ratio, which is higher than POWR's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDU vs. POWR - Dividend Comparison

IDU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.23%, less than POWR's 6.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDU
iShares U.S. Utilities ETF
2.23%2.23%2.29%2.79%2.39%2.39%2.94%2.71%2.80%2.62%3.18%4.22%
POWR
iShares U.S. Power Infrastructure ETF
6.66%7.56%4.36%4.16%4.82%3.94%3.96%5.71%3.17%3.11%2.75%3.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDU and POWR have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

POWR has higher volatility (5.77%) compared to IDU (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDU dropped -53.88% vs POWR's -65.98%.

On 10-year performance, IDU leads with 8.80% vs 8.59% for POWR. On fees, POWR is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, IDU has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDU has performed better with a 8.80% return vs 8.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

POWR is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.42% for IDU.

POWR has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 2.23% for IDU.

Their fees differ too: 0.42% for IDU and 0.40% for POWR.

POWR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDU and POWR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer