IDR vs. PHIN
IDR (Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc.) and PHIN (PHINIA Inc.) are both stocks. IDR operates in Gold (Basic Materials), while PHIN operates in Auto Parts (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, IDR returned 72.74%/yr vs 45.61%/yr for PHIN. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
IDR vs. PHIN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDR achieves a -28.64% return, which is significantly lower than PHIN's 30.30% return.
IDR
- 1D
- -6.62%
- 1M
- -25.55%
- 6M
- -37.86%
- YTD
- -28.64%
- 1Y
- 47.79%
- 3Y*
- 72.74%
- 5Y*
- 45.05%
- 10Y*
- 32.96%
PHIN
- 1D
- 1.89%
- 1M
- -0.80%
- 6M
- 16.49%
- YTD
- 30.30%
- 1Y
- 70.02%
- 3Y*
- 45.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDR vs. PHIN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IDR Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. | -28.64% | 295.49% | 60.95% | 23.90% |
PHIN PHINIA Inc. | 30.30% | 32.99% | 62.69% | 2.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDR and PHIN is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 2023 | 0.10 |
The correlation between IDR and PHIN shifts across timeframes, from 0.09 (3 years) to 0.21 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
IDR:
$454.69M
PHIN:
$3.00B
IDR:
$1.41
PHIN:
$3.60
IDR:
20.40
PHIN:
22.49
IDR:
0.03
PHIN:
1.21
IDR:
8.80
PHIN:
0.89
IDR:
3.94
PHIN:
2.02
IDR:
$49.61M
PHIN:
$3.57B
IDR:
$23.05M
PHIN:
$763.00M
IDR:
$24.61M
PHIN:
$374.00M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDR vs. PHIN — Risk / Return Rank
IDR
PHIN
IDR vs. PHIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) and PHINIA Inc. (PHIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDR | PHIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.36 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 3.46 | -2.49 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.85 | 9.38 | -7.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDR vs. PHIN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDR drawdown since its inception was -93.44%, which is greater than PHIN's maximum drawdown of -34.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDR and PHIN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDR | PHIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.44% | -34.71% | -58.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -49.96% | -20.37% | -29.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -49.96% | -32.86% | -17.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -62.42% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.42% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -45.39% | -4.85% | -40.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -47.21% | -11.93% | -35.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 25.85% | 7.49% | +18.36% |
Volatility
IDR vs. PHIN - Volatility Comparison
Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. (IDR) has a higher volatility of 16.54% compared to PHINIA Inc. (PHIN) at 12.73%. This indicates that IDR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PHIN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDR | PHIN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.54% | 12.73% | +3.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 60.88% | 25.69% | +35.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 87.33% | 31.36% | +55.97% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 73.14% | 42.62% | +30.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 85.77% | 42.62% | +43.15% |
Dividends
IDR vs. PHIN - Dividend Comparison
IDR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PHIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.41%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
IDR Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PHIN PHINIA Inc. | 1.41% | 1.72% | 2.08% | 1.65% |
Financials
IDR vs. PHIN - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. and PHINIA Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
IDR vs. PHIN - Profitability Comparison
IDR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. reported a gross profit of 8.18M and revenue of 14.48M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 56.5%.
PHIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported a gross profit of 188.00M and revenue of 878.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.4%.
IDR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. reported an operating income of 7.58M and revenue of 14.48M, resulting in an operating margin of 52.4%.
PHIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported an operating income of 69.00M and revenue of 878.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.
IDR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Idaho Strategic Resources, Inc. reported a net income of 6.39M and revenue of 14.48M, resulting in a net margin of 44.1%.
PHIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, PHINIA Inc. reported a net income of 37.00M and revenue of 878.00M, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.
Frequently Asked Questions
IDR and PHIN have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDR has higher volatility (16.54%) compared to PHIN (12.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDR dropped -93.44% vs PHIN's -34.71%.
PHIN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDR and PHIN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer