PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDOG vs. AMLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDOG vs. AMLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDOG achieves a 14.02% return, which is significantly lower than AMLP's 16.31% return. Over the past 10 years, IDOG has outperformed AMLP with an annualized return of 10.99%, while AMLP has yielded a comparatively lower 6.76% annualized return.


IDOG

1D
-0.47%
1M
3.24%
YTD
14.02%
6M
16.64%
1Y
35.52%
3Y*
21.96%
5Y*
13.36%
10Y*
10.99%

AMLP

1D
-0.27%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
16.31%
6M
14.89%
1Y
17.06%
3Y*
20.15%
5Y*
16.90%
10Y*
6.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDOG vs. AMLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
14.02%39.94%1.35%23.57%-4.50%11.33%-1.78%21.93%-13.47%25.61%
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
16.31%5.78%22.76%21.40%25.47%39.09%-32.26%5.99%-12.67%-7.89%

Correlation

The correlation between IDOG and AMLP is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.33

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2013

0.46

Over the past year, the correlation between IDOG and AMLP has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.46, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

IDOG vs. AMLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDOG
AMLP

Industrials

11.7%

-

Financial Services

11.0%

-

Energy

10.7%
97.7%

Utilities

10.0%
2.3%

Basic Materials

10.0%

-

Communication Services

9.9%

-

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.4%

-

Healthcare

9.3%

-

Technology

8.5%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

IDOG
11.7%
AMLP

-

Financial Services

IDOG
11.0%
AMLP

-

Energy

IDOG
10.7%
AMLP
97.7%

Utilities

IDOG
10.0%
AMLP
2.3%

Basic Materials

IDOG
10.0%
AMLP

-

Communication Services

IDOG
9.9%
AMLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

IDOG
9.5%
AMLP

-

Consumer Defensive

IDOG
9.4%
AMLP

-

Healthcare

IDOG
9.3%
AMLP

-

Technology

IDOG
8.5%
AMLP

-

Real Estate

IDOG

-

AMLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDOG vs. AMLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDOG
IDOG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
IDOG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDOG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDOG Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IDOG Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDOG Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

AMLP
AMLP Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
AMLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AMLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
AMLP Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
AMLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
AMLP Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDOG vs. AMLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) and Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDOGAMLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.25

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.51

1.92

+3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.31

6.37

+12.94

IDOG vs. AMLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDOG Sharpe Ratio is 2.68, which is higher than the AMLP Sharpe Ratio of 1.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDOG and AMLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDOGAMLPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.68

1.45

+1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

0.85

+0.01

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.24

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.22

+0.29

Drawdowns

IDOG vs. AMLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDOG drawdown since its inception was -37.32%, smaller than the maximum AMLP drawdown of -77.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDOG and AMLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDOGAMLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.32%

-77.19%

+39.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.47%

-8.94%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.92%

-14.27%

+0.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.31%

-20.92%

-4.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.32%

-72.62%

+35.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.47%

-4.10%

+3.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.93%

-17.40%

+9.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.84%

2.68%

-0.84%

Volatility

IDOG vs. AMLP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (IDOG) is 4.13%, while Alerian MLP ETF (AMLP) has a volatility of 4.91%. This indicates that IDOG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AMLP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDOGAMLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

4.91%

-0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.09%

8.66%

+1.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.33%

11.90%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.61%

19.98%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.45%

27.68%

-10.23%

IDOG vs. AMLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDOG has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is lower than AMLP's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDOG vs. AMLP - Dividend Comparison

IDOG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.42%, less than AMLP's 7.64% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AMLP
Alerian MLP ETF
7.64%8.36%7.70%7.86%7.70%8.55%12.31%9.12%9.29%7.97%8.09%9.84%
IDOG
ALPS International Sector Dividend Dogs ETF
3.42%4.26%4.90%4.86%4.46%3.85%3.00%5.41%4.50%3.33%4.01%4.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDOG and AMLP have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AMLP has higher volatility (4.91%) compared to IDOG (4.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDOG dropped -37.32% vs AMLP's -77.19%.

On 10-year performance, IDOG leads with 10.99% vs 6.76% for AMLP. On fees, IDOG is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, IDOG has been the lower-risk option at 4.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IDOG has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 6.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDOG is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for AMLP.

AMLP has the higher dividend yield at 7.64%, compared with 3.42% for IDOG.

IDOG is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while AMLP is MLPs. IDOG tracks S-Network International Sector Dividend Dogs Index, while AMLP tracks Alerian MLP Infrastructure Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IDOG and 0.90% for AMLP.

IDOG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.68 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDOG and AMLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer