IDNA vs. TRUH
IDNA (iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF) and TRUH (VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF) are both Health & Biotech Equities funds. IDNA is passively managed, while TRUH is actively managed. Their 0.44 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. IDNA charges 0.47%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for TRUH.
Performance
IDNA vs. TRUH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
IDNA
- 1D
- -1.40%
- 1M
- -7.39%
- 6M
- 13.88%
- YTD
- 23.97%
- 1Y
- 54.41%
- 3Y*
- 12.75%
- 5Y*
- -7.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.74%
TRUH
- 1D
- -0.52%
- 1M
- -0.28%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $842.73K | $1.44M | $1.52M | |
| $23.58K | $32.63K | $24.16K |
IDNA vs. TRUH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
IDNA iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF | 11.23% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 10.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDNA and TRUH is 0.44, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDNA vs. TRUH — Risk / Return Rank
IDNA
TRUH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDNA vs. TRUH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF (IDNA) and VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF (TRUH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDNA | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.06 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.37 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDNA vs. TRUH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDNA drawdown since its inception was -68.26%, which is greater than TRUH's maximum drawdown of -4.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDNA and TRUH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDNA | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.26% | -4.51% | -63.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.66% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -68.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -38.88% | -2.75% | -36.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.30% | -1.64% | -34.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | — | — |
Volatility
IDNA vs. TRUH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDNA | TRUH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.04% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.24% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.03% | 17.62% | +7.41% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.50% | 17.62% | +10.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.44% | 17.62% | +11.82% |
IDNA vs. TRUH - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDNA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is higher than TRUH's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDNA vs. TRUH - Dividend Comparison
IDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than TRUH's 0.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDNA iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF | 0.87% | 1.18% | 0.98% | 1.04% | 0.54% | 0.70% | 0.26% | 0.80% |
TRUH VanEck Healthcare TruSector ETF | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDNA and TRUH have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRUH is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRUH is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.47% for IDNA.
IDNA has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.30% for TRUH.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.47% for IDNA and 0.10% for TRUH.
Find the right allocation for IDNA and TRUH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer