PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDNA vs. CANC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IDNA vs. CANC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IDNA vs. CANC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IDNA
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund
11.45%17.26%-0.72%-7.63%-42.28%-13.11%
CANC
Tema Oncology ETF
6.91%42.92%-5.37%510.51%-85.34%-51.82%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDNA achieves a 11.45% return, which is significantly higher than CANC's 6.91% return.


IDNA

1D
0.48%
1M
-5.56%
YTD
11.45%
6M
20.68%
1Y
48.06%
3Y*
9.03%
5Y*
-7.93%
10Y*

CANC

1D
1.16%
1M
-0.89%
YTD
6.91%
6M
27.17%
1Y
58.38%
3Y*
140.92%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IDNA vs. CANC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDNA has a 0.47% expense ratio, which is lower than CANC's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IDNA vs. CANC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDNA
IDNA Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
IDNA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDNA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDNA Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IDNA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDNA Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

CANC
CANC Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
CANC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CANC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
CANC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
CANC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CANC Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDNA vs. CANC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA) and Tema Oncology ETF (CANC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDNACANCDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.75

2.17

-0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.40

2.84

-0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.66

4.37

-0.71

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.65

15.21

-3.56

IDNA vs. CANC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDNA Sharpe Ratio is 1.75, which is comparable to the CANC Sharpe Ratio of 2.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDNA and CANC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDNACANCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.75

2.17

-0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.11

-0.04

+0.14

Correlation

The correlation between IDNA and CANC is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

IDNA vs. CANC - Dividend Comparison

IDNA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.06%, more than CANC's 0.05% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
IDNA
iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund
1.06%1.18%0.98%1.04%0.54%0.70%0.26%0.80%
CANC
Tema Oncology ETF
0.05%0.06%3.00%0.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

IDNA vs. CANC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDNA drawdown since its inception was -68.26%, smaller than the maximum CANC drawdown of -97.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDNA and CANC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IDNACANCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.26%

-97.53%

+29.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.11%

-12.40%

+0.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-45.05%

-55.68%

+10.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.05%

-73.89%

+37.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.81%

3.57%

+0.24%

Volatility

IDNA vs. CANC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Genomics Immunology and Healthcare ETF Genomics Immunology and Healthcare Fund (IDNA) has a higher volatility of 9.54% compared to Tema Oncology ETF (CANC) at 8.20%. This indicates that IDNA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CANC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IDNACANCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.54%

8.20%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.22%

16.22%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.75%

27.19%

+0.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.53%

285.53%

-257.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.68%

285.53%

-255.85%