PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. QQQM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. QQQM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 8.19% return, which is significantly lower than QQQM's 20.73% return.


IDMO

1D
0.42%
1M
1.27%
YTD
8.19%
6M
12.09%
1Y
23.26%
3Y*
26.17%
5Y*
15.63%
10Y*
12.04%

QQQM

1D
-0.54%
1M
8.67%
YTD
20.73%
6M
19.22%
1Y
40.83%
3Y*
28.64%
5Y*
17.94%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. QQQM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
8.19%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%8.33%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
20.73%20.85%25.68%55.01%-32.52%27.45%6.67%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and QQQM is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2020

0.66

The correlation between IDMO and QQQM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDMO vs. QQQM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
QQQM

Financial Services

42.4%
0.2%

Industrials

22.6%
2.8%

Basic Materials

10.2%
1.1%

Utilities

8.4%
1.4%

Technology

5.3%
53.8%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
7.7%

Communication Services

2.2%
15.8%

Real Estate

2.0%
0.1%

Energy

1.9%
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.4%
12.3%

Healthcare

1.2%
4.2%

Financial Services

IDMO
42.4%
QQQM
0.2%

Industrials

IDMO
22.6%
QQQM
2.8%

Basic Materials

IDMO
10.2%
QQQM
1.1%

Utilities

IDMO
8.4%
QQQM
1.4%

Technology

IDMO
5.3%
QQQM
53.8%

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
2.5%
QQQM
7.7%

Communication Services

IDMO
2.2%
QQQM
15.8%

Real Estate

IDMO
2.0%
QQQM
0.1%

Energy

IDMO
1.9%
QQQM
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
1.4%
QQQM
12.3%

Healthcare

IDMO
1.2%
QQQM
4.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. QQQM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQM
QQQM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
QQQM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQM Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. QQQM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDMOQQQMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.44

-0.19

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.90

3.43

-1.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.89

13.15

-5.26

IDMO vs. QQQM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is lower than the QQQM Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and QQQM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDMOQQQMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.38

2.58

-1.19

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.81

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.84

-0.39

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. QQQM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, which is greater than QQQM's maximum drawdown of -35.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and QQQM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMOQQQMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-35.04%

-4.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-11.96%

-0.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-22.70%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-35.04%

+7.97%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.90%

-0.75%

-1.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.75%

-8.24%

-1.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

3.11%

-0.16%

Volatility

IDMO vs. QQQM - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 6.31% compared to Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF (QQQM) at 4.51%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMOQQQMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.31%

4.51%

+1.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.88%

12.06%

+2.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.88%

15.91%

+0.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.83%

22.23%

-4.40%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

22.11%

-4.00%

IDMO vs. QQQM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQM's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDMO vs. QQQM - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.52%, more than QQQM's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.52%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%
QQQM
Invesco NASDAQ 100 ETF
0.42%0.50%0.61%0.65%0.83%0.40%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and QQQM have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (6.31%) compared to QQQM (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs QQQM's -35.04%.

On 5-year performance, QQQM leads with 17.94% vs 15.63% for IDMO. On fees, QQQM is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QQQM has been the lower-risk option at 4.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, QQQM has performed better with a 17.94% return vs 15.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QQQM is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IDMO.

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.52%, compared with 0.42% for QQQM.

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while QQQM is Nasdaq-100. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while QQQM tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.15% for QQQM.

QQQM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and QQQM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer