PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDMO vs. HEFA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDMO vs. HEFA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 9.71% return, which is significantly lower than HEFA's 12.74% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with IDMO having a 13.04% annualized return and HEFA not far ahead at 13.63%.


IDMO

1D
1.25%
1M
-0.51%
YTD
9.71%
6M
8.67%
1Y
24.80%
3Y*
26.44%
5Y*
15.55%
10Y*
13.04%

HEFA

1D
0.60%
1M
1.90%
YTD
12.74%
6M
12.69%
1Y
30.25%
3Y*
19.62%
5Y*
13.80%
10Y*
13.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. HEFA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
9.71%42.17%12.79%20.16%-12.03%14.31%22.01%26.09%-16.66%29.21%
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
12.74%24.58%13.71%20.33%-4.86%19.59%2.09%27.63%-9.33%16.67%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and HEFA is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 14, 2014

0.60

Over the past year, IDMO and HEFA have become more correlated (0.81) than their long-term average of 0.60, meaning their price movements have been converging.

IDMO vs. HEFA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDMO
HEFA

Financial Services

43.2%
24.3%

Industrials

21.3%
18.0%

Basic Materials

10.6%
6.0%

Utilities

7.9%
3.4%

Technology

6.2%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.5%
6.5%

Communication Services

2.1%
4.3%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.4%

Energy

1.7%
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

1.5%
7.1%

Healthcare

1.1%
9.5%

Financial Services

IDMO
43.2%
HEFA
24.3%

Industrials

IDMO
21.3%
HEFA
18.0%

Basic Materials

IDMO
10.6%
HEFA
6.0%

Utilities

IDMO
7.9%
HEFA
3.4%

Technology

IDMO
6.2%
HEFA
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

IDMO
2.5%
HEFA
6.5%

Communication Services

IDMO
2.1%
HEFA
4.3%

Real Estate

IDMO
1.8%
HEFA
1.4%

Energy

IDMO
1.7%
HEFA
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

IDMO
1.5%
HEFA
7.1%

Healthcare

IDMO
1.1%
HEFA
9.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDMO vs. HEFA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO
IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

HEFA
HEFA Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
HEFA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HEFA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
HEFA Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
HEFA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
HEFA Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. HEFA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDMOHEFADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.44

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

3.19

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.15

13.35

-5.20

IDMO vs. HEFA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is lower than the HEFA Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and HEFA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. HEFA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, which is greater than HEFA's maximum drawdown of -32.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and HEFA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMOHEFADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.38%

-32.39%

-6.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.31%

-9.52%

-2.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.65%

-14.28%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.07%

-14.79%

-12.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-31.34%

-32.39%

+1.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.65%

-1.04%

-1.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.72%

-4.15%

-5.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.05%

2.27%

+0.78%

Volatility

IDMO vs. HEFA - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF (HEFA) at 4.43%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HEFA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDMOHEFADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.77%

4.43%

+3.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.41%

10.75%

+5.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.15%

13.10%

+5.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.10%

13.86%

+4.24%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.96%

15.70%

+2.26%

IDMO vs. HEFA - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than HEFA's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDMO vs. HEFA - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.64%, less than HEFA's 3.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
HEFA
iShares Currency Hedged MSCI EAFE ETF
3.90%4.40%3.09%3.02%25.14%3.06%2.10%7.56%4.58%2.55%3.17%3.54%
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
3.64%3.71%2.24%2.89%3.66%1.81%1.63%2.78%3.27%3.08%2.18%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDMO and HEFA have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDMO has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to HEFA (4.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs HEFA's -32.39%.

On 10-year performance, HEFA leads with 13.63% vs 13.04% for IDMO. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, HEFA has been the lower-risk option at 4.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, HEFA has performed better with a 13.63% return vs 13.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for HEFA.

HEFA has the higher dividend yield at 3.90%, compared with 3.64% for IDMO.

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while HEFA is Foreign Large Cap Equities. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while HEFA tracks MSCI EAFE 100% Hedged to USD Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.35% for HEFA.

HEFA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDMO and HEFA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer