IDMO vs. GNR

Last updated Jun 9, 2026

IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) and GNR (SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while GNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IDMO returned 12.02%/yr vs 10.53%/yr for GNR. At a 0.50 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDMO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for GNR.

Performance

IDMO vs. GNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than GNR's 15.95% return. Over the past 10 years, IDMO has outperformed GNR with an annualized return of 12.02%, while GNR has yielded a comparatively lower 10.53% annualized return.

IDMO

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -3.78%
• YTD: 5.33%
• 6M: 8.93%
• 1Y: 19.27%
• 3Y*: 24.47%
• 5Y*: 15.15%
• 10Y*: 12.02%

GNR

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -2.80%
• YTD: 15.95%
• 6M: 20.08%
• 1Y: 37.42%
• 3Y*: 13.57%
• 5Y*: 9.11%
• 10Y*: 10.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDMO vs. GNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	5.33%	42.17%	12.79%	20.16%	-12.03%	14.31%	22.01%	26.09%	-16.66%	29.21%
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	15.95%	28.68%	-8.27%	2.95%	10.20%	24.73%	-0.03%	16.49%	-13.19%	22.64%

Correlation

The correlation between IDMO and GNR is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2012	0.50

The correlation between IDMO and GNR shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.64 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

IDMO vs. GNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDMO	GNR
Financial Services	42.4%	0.0%
Industrials	22.6%	0.2%
Basic Materials	10.2%	50.3%
Utilities	8.4%	0.0%
Technology	5.3%	-
Consumer Defensive	2.5%	4.6%
Communication Services	2.2%	-
Real Estate	2.0%	0.8%
Energy	1.9%	37.6%
Consumer Cyclical	1.4%	6.3%
Healthcare	1.2%	0.0%

Return for Risk

IDMO vs. GNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDMO

IDMO Risk / Return Rank: 36
IDMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
IDMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
IDMO Omega Ratio Rank: 35
IDMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
IDMO Martin Ratio Rank: 43

GNR

GNR Risk / Return Rank: 80
GNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
GNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
GNR Omega Ratio Rank: 74
GNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
GNR Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDMO vs. GNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IDMO	GNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.12	2.23	-1.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.67	2.86	-1.18
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.39	-0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.57	4.72	-3.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.49	18.00	-11.51
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IDMO vs. GNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDMO Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the GNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDMO and GNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IDMO	GNR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.12	2.23	-1.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	0.45	+0.40
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67	0.48	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.44	0.25	+0.19

Drawdowns

IDMO vs. GNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, smaller than the maximum GNR drawdown of -51.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and GNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDMO	GNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-39.38%	-51.37%	+11.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.31%	-7.97%	-4.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.65%	-21.15%	+8.50%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.07%	-25.66%	-1.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-31.34%	-48.59%	+17.25%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.49%	-5.04%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.75%	-14.94%	+5.19%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.99%	2.08%	+0.91%

Volatility

IDMO vs. GNR - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 6.18% compared to SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF (GNR) at 5.49%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDMO	GNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.18%	5.49%	+0.69%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.28%	13.73%	+1.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.25%	16.88%	+0.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.90%	20.30%	-2.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.14%	21.90%	-3.76%

IDMO vs. GNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than GNR's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDMO vs. GNR - Dividend Comparison

IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than GNR's 2.56% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GNR SPDR S&P Global Natural Resources ETF	2.56%	2.76%	4.73%	3.37%	4.37%	3.44%	2.78%	3.84%	3.51%	2.40%	2.06%	4.59%
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF	3.61%	3.71%	2.24%	2.89%	3.66%	1.81%	1.63%	2.78%	3.27%	3.08%	2.18%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDMO and GNR in my portfolio?

IDMO and GNR have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, IDMO or GNR?

IDMO has higher volatility (6.18%) compared to GNR (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs GNR's -51.37%.

Which ETF is better, IDMO or GNR?

On 10-year performance, IDMO leads with 12.02% vs 10.53% for GNR. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, GNR has been the lower-risk option at 5.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDMO or GNR?

Over the 10-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 12.02% return vs 10.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDMO or GNR?

IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GNR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDMO or GNR?

IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.56% for GNR.

What is the main difference between IDMO and GNR?

IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while GNR is Commodity Producers Equities. IDMO tracks S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while GNR tracks S&P Global Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.40% for GNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.