IDMO vs. GLOF
Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF).
IDMO and GLOF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IDMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. It was launched on Feb 24, 2012. GLOF is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the STOXX Global Equity Factor Index. It was launched on Apr 28, 2005. Both IDMO and GLOF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IDMO or GLOF.
Correlation
The correlation between IDMO and GLOF is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
IDMO vs. GLOF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
IDMO:
0.88
GLOF:
1.45
IDMO:
1.26
GLOF:
2.00
IDMO:
1.16
GLOF:
1.26
IDMO:
1.25
GLOF:
2.00
IDMO:
4.39
GLOF:
8.19
IDMO:
3.24%
GLOF:
2.13%
IDMO:
16.23%
GLOF:
12.02%
IDMO:
-39.36%
GLOF:
-34.12%
IDMO:
-2.00%
GLOF:
-1.57%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 7.58% return, which is significantly higher than GLOF's 3.96% return.
IDMO
7.58%
3.77%
3.13%
12.92%
11.56%
8.87%
GLOF
3.96%
0.37%
4.26%
15.23%
10.01%
N/A
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IDMO vs. GLOF - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than GLOF's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IDMO vs. GLOF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
IDMO
GLOF
IDMO vs. GLOF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IDMO vs. GLOF - Dividend Comparison
IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.08%, less than GLOF's 2.49% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 2.10% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% | 2.18% |
GLOF iShares Global Equity Factor ETF | 2.49% | 2.59% | 2.51% | 2.53% | 1.90% | 1.73% | 2.41% | 2.03% | 1.94% | 1.94% | 0.92% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
IDMO vs. GLOF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.36%, which is greater than GLOF's maximum drawdown of -34.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and GLOF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IDMO vs. GLOF - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to iShares Global Equity Factor ETF (GLOF) at 3.15%. This indicates that IDMO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLOF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.