IDMO vs. AVES
IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) and AVES (Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index, while AVES is a Emerging Markets Equities fund actively managed by Avantis. IDMO is passively managed, while AVES is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDMO returned 24.47%/yr vs 18.05%/yr for AVES. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDMO charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for AVES.
Performance
IDMO vs. AVES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDMO achieves a 5.33% return, which is significantly lower than AVES's 11.39% return.
IDMO
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- -3.78%
- YTD
- 5.33%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 19.27%
- 3Y*
- 24.47%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 12.02%
AVES
- 1D
- 0.64%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- 11.39%
- 6M
- 13.83%
- 1Y
- 28.23%
- 3Y*
- 18.05%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDMO vs. AVES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 5.33% | 42.17% | 12.79% | 20.16% | -12.03% | 6.69% |
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 11.39% | 30.49% | 4.50% | 16.79% | -16.04% | 1.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDMO and AVES is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2021 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IDMO and AVES has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDMO vs. AVES - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDMO
AVES
Financial Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Technology
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Real Estate
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Financial Services
IDMO
AVES
Industrials
IDMO
AVES
Basic Materials
IDMO
AVES
Utilities
IDMO
AVES
Technology
IDMO
AVES
Consumer Defensive
IDMO
AVES
Communication Services
IDMO
AVES
Real Estate
IDMO
AVES
Energy
IDMO
AVES
Consumer Cyclical
IDMO
AVES
Healthcare
IDMO
AVES
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDMO vs. AVES — Risk / Return Rank
IDMO
AVES
IDMO vs. AVES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) and Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDMO | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.44 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.30 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.57 | 2.20 | -0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.49 | 8.06 | -1.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDMO | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.12 | 1.59 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.54 | -0.10 |
Drawdowns
IDMO vs. AVES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDMO drawdown since its inception was -39.38%, which is greater than AVES's maximum drawdown of -27.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDMO and AVES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDMO | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.38% | -27.40% | -11.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.31% | -12.90% | +0.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.65% | -18.50% | +5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.07% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.34% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.49% | -5.93% | +1.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.75% | -7.72% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.99% | 3.51% | -0.52% |
Volatility
IDMO vs. AVES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO) is 6.18%, while Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF (AVES) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that IDMO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AVES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDMO | AVES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.18% | 8.21% | -2.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.28% | 15.35% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.25% | 17.90% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.90% | 17.12% | +0.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 17.12% | +1.02% |
IDMO vs. AVES - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDMO has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than AVES's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDMO vs. AVES - Dividend Comparison
IDMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, more than AVES's 2.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVES Avantis Emerging Markets Value ETF | 2.95% | 3.17% | 4.09% | 3.96% | 3.70% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.61% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDMO and AVES have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AVES has higher volatility (8.21%) compared to IDMO (6.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDMO dropped -39.38% vs AVES's -27.40%.
On 3-year performance, IDMO leads with 24.47% vs 18.05% for AVES. On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IDMO has been the lower-risk option at 6.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IDMO has performed better with a 24.47% return vs 18.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for AVES.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.61%, compared with 2.95% for AVES.
IDMO is categorized as Momentum, while AVES is Emerging Markets Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDMO and 0.36% for AVES.
AVES currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDMO and AVES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer