PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDME vs. DFAU
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

IDME vs. DFAU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

IDME vs. DFAU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
5.02%27.53%6.12%9.07%-19.79%-1.25%
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
-2.67%16.78%23.17%24.79%-16.99%8.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDME achieves a 5.02% return, which is significantly higher than DFAU's -2.67% return.


IDME

1D
2.27%
1M
-4.19%
YTD
5.02%
6M
8.90%
1Y
27.90%
3Y*
14.21%
5Y*
10Y*

DFAU

1D
0.71%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-2.67%
6M
-0.51%
1Y
19.02%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
11.15%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


IDME vs. DFAU - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDME has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than DFAU's 0.12% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

IDME vs. DFAU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDME
IDME Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
IDME Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDME Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDME Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
IDME Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDME Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

DFAU
DFAU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
DFAU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFAU Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFAU Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
DFAU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFAU Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDME vs. DFAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) and Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDMEDFAUDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.64

1.03

+0.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.27

1.56

+0.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.24

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

1.56

+0.91

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.47

7.42

+2.05

IDME vs. DFAU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDME Sharpe Ratio is 1.64, which is higher than the DFAU Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDME and DFAU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDMEDFAUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.64

1.03

+0.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.80

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between IDME and DFAU is 0.72, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

IDME vs. DFAU - Dividend Comparison

IDME's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.51%, more than DFAU's 1.03% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
IDME
Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF
5.51%4.90%5.64%3.71%2.62%1.38%0.00%
DFAU
Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF
1.03%0.95%1.10%1.29%1.40%1.00%0.13%

Drawdowns

IDME vs. DFAU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDME drawdown since its inception was -29.20%, which is greater than DFAU's maximum drawdown of -23.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDME and DFAU.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


IDMEDFAUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.20%

-23.61%

-5.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.46%

-12.45%

+0.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.34%

-5.36%

-0.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.51%

-5.12%

-6.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.99%

2.62%

+0.37%

Volatility

IDME vs. DFAU - Volatility Comparison

Aptus International Drawdown Managed Equity ETF (IDME) has a higher volatility of 7.61% compared to Dimensional US Core Equity Market ETF (DFAU) at 5.39%. This indicates that IDME's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


IDMEDFAUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.61%

5.39%

+2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.67%

9.67%

+2.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.10%

18.52%

-1.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.48%

17.03%

-2.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.48%

16.87%

-2.39%