IDLV vs. TAIL
IDLV (Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF) and TAIL (Cambria Tail Risk ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. IDLV is passively managed, while TAIL is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDLV returned 5.88%/yr vs -8.38%/yr for TAIL. At a correlation of -0.41, they often move in opposite directions. IDLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for TAIL.
Performance
IDLV vs. TAIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly higher than TAIL's -6.17% return.
IDLV
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 9.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- 5.12%
TAIL
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.15%
- YTD
- -6.17%
- 6M
- -7.55%
- 1Y
- -8.73%
- 3Y*
- -5.76%
- 5Y*
- -8.38%
- 10Y*
- —
IDLV vs. TAIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 2.35% | 27.77% | 2.15% | 9.18% | -12.21% | 9.76% | -9.78% | 20.09% | -8.02% | 6.30% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | -6.17% | 5.48% | -9.62% | -13.29% | -13.13% | -12.81% | 6.91% | -14.27% | 2.85% | -7.70% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDLV and TAIL is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.22 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2017 | -0.41 |
The correlation between IDLV and TAIL shifts across timeframes, from -0.41 (all time) to -0.14 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
IDLV vs. TAIL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDLV
TAIL
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
IDLV
TAIL
Industrials
IDLV
TAIL
Real Estate
IDLV
TAIL
Consumer Defensive
IDLV
TAIL
Utilities
IDLV
TAIL
Communication Services
IDLV
TAIL
Consumer Cyclical
IDLV
TAIL
Energy
IDLV
TAIL
Basic Materials
IDLV
TAIL
Healthcare
IDLV
TAIL
Technology
IDLV
TAIL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDLV vs. TAIL — Risk / Return Rank
IDLV
TAIL
IDLV vs. TAIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | -1.03 | +1.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | -1.46 | +2.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 0.83 | +0.34 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | -0.80 | +2.05 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | -2.01 | +5.70 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | -1.03 | +1.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | -0.57 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | -0.48 | +0.93 |
Drawdowns
IDLV vs. TAIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, smaller than the maximum TAIL drawdown of -52.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and TAIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.65% | -52.36% | +17.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.54% | -10.95% | +3.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.97% | -20.65% | +10.68% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.52% | -38.44% | +15.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.95% | -51.56% | +45.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -29.12% | +23.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 4.35% | -1.81% |
Volatility
IDLV vs. TAIL - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Cambria Tail Risk ETF (TAIL) at 0.86%. This indicates that IDLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAIL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDLV | TAIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 0.86% | +1.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.65% | 6.45% | +1.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.79% | 8.51% | +1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 14.90% | -3.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 14.94% | -1.54% |
IDLV vs. TAIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TAIL's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDLV vs. TAIL - Dividend Comparison
IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than TAIL's 3.49% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 4.71% | 4.63% | 3.41% | 3.59% | 4.69% | 2.99% | 2.30% | 4.92% | 3.94% | 3.05% | 3.92% | 3.93% |
TAIL Cambria Tail Risk ETF | 3.49% | 2.88% | 3.48% | 3.74% | 1.50% | 0.49% | 0.36% | 1.58% | 1.52% | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDLV and TAIL have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDLV has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to TAIL (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs TAIL's -52.36%.
On 5-year performance, IDLV leads with 5.88% vs -8.38% for TAIL. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, TAIL has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDLV has performed better with a 5.88% return vs -8.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for TAIL.
IDLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 3.49% for TAIL.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDLV and 0.59% for TAIL.
IDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs -1.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDLV and TAIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer