PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDLV vs. FSKLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDLV vs. FSKLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than FSKLX's 3.96% return. Over the past 10 years, IDLV has underperformed FSKLX with an annualized return of 5.12%, while FSKLX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.80% annualized return.


IDLV

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
2.35%
6M
4.22%
1Y
9.36%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
5.12%

FSKLX

1D
-0.37%
1M
-1.03%
YTD
3.96%
6M
6.12%
1Y
9.07%
3Y*
10.75%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
5.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDLV vs. FSKLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
2.35%27.77%2.15%9.18%-12.21%9.76%-9.78%20.09%-8.02%22.01%
FSKLX
Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
3.96%21.95%1.20%13.84%-13.48%9.91%-1.57%16.12%-4.88%21.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IDLV and FSKLX is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2015

0.88

The correlation between IDLV and FSKLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDLV vs. FSKLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDLV
IDLV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FSKLX
FSKLX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
FSKLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSKLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSKLX Omega Ratio Rank: 99
Omega Ratio Rank
FSKLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSKLX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDLV vs. FSKLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDLVFSKLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.14

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

0.93

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.69

2.57

+1.12

IDLV vs. FSKLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is comparable to the FSKLX Sharpe Ratio of 0.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDLV and FSKLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDLVFSKLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

0.76

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.48

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

0.49

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.45

-0.01

Drawdowns

IDLV vs. FSKLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, which is greater than FSKLX's maximum drawdown of -27.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and FSKLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDLVFSKLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.65%

-27.26%

-7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-8.64%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.97%

-11.59%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-24.99%

+2.47%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.65%

-27.26%

-7.39%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.95%

-6.75%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-5.14%

-0.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

3.12%

-0.58%

Volatility

IDLV vs. FSKLX - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund (FSKLX) have volatilities of 2.69% and 2.68%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDLVFSKLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

2.68%

+0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

7.92%

-0.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

10.61%

-0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.80%

11.51%

+0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.40%

11.94%

+1.46%

IDLV vs. FSKLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKLX's 0.17% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDLV vs. FSKLX - Dividend Comparison

IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, more than FSKLX's 2.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSKLX
Fidelity SAI International Low Volatility Index Fund
2.49%2.59%2.09%2.31%2.01%2.42%1.32%6.06%2.64%1.69%2.85%1.10%
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
4.71%4.63%3.41%3.59%4.69%2.99%2.30%4.92%3.94%3.05%3.92%3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDLV and FSKLX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDLV has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to FSKLX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs FSKLX's -27.26%.

IDLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.96 vs 0.76), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDLV and FSKLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer