IDLV vs. FLLV
IDLV (Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF) and FLLV (Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. IDLV is passively managed, while FLLV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDLV returned 5.88%/yr vs 11.11%/yr for FLLV. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDLV charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FLLV.
Performance
IDLV vs. FLLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than FLLV's 13.04% return.
IDLV
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- -1.99%
- YTD
- 2.35%
- 6M
- 4.22%
- 1Y
- 9.36%
- 3Y*
- 11.74%
- 5Y*
- 5.88%
- 10Y*
- 5.12%
FLLV
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- 2.34%
- YTD
- 13.04%
- 6M
- 14.26%
- 1Y
- 26.92%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- 11.11%
- 10Y*
- —
IDLV vs. FLLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 2.35% | 27.77% | 2.15% | 9.18% | -12.21% | 9.76% | -9.78% | 20.09% | -8.02% | 22.01% |
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 13.04% | 15.92% | 10.70% | 13.87% | -8.54% | 23.36% | 12.33% | 32.72% | -2.14% | 19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDLV and FLLV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016 | 0.61 |
The correlation between IDLV and FLLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDLV vs. FLLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDLV
FLLV
Financial Services
Industrials
Real Estate
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Technology
Financial Services
IDLV
FLLV
Industrials
IDLV
FLLV
Real Estate
IDLV
FLLV
Consumer Defensive
IDLV
FLLV
Utilities
IDLV
FLLV
Communication Services
IDLV
FLLV
Consumer Cyclical
IDLV
FLLV
Energy
IDLV
FLLV
Basic Materials
IDLV
FLLV
Healthcare
IDLV
FLLV
Technology
IDLV
FLLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDLV vs. FLLV — Risk / Return Rank
IDLV
FLLV
IDLV vs. FLLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDLV | FLLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 3.26 | -2.30 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.41 | 4.73 | -3.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.61 | -0.43 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.25 | 5.52 | -4.27 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 20.83 | -17.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDLV | FLLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 3.26 | -2.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.84 | -0.34 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.84 | -0.39 |
Drawdowns
IDLV vs. FLLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, roughly equal to the maximum FLLV drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and FLLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDLV | FLLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.65% | -33.95% | -0.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.54% | -4.90% | -2.64% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.97% | -14.01% | +4.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.52% | -18.40% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.95% | -0.76% | -5.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.95% | -3.25% | -2.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.54% | 1.30% | +1.24% |
Volatility
IDLV vs. FLLV - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) at 2.02%. This indicates that IDLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDLV | FLLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.69% | 2.02% | +0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.65% | 5.96% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.79% | 8.32% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.80% | 13.27% | -1.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.40% | 15.69% | -2.29% |
IDLV vs. FLLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FLLV's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDLV vs. FLLV - Dividend Comparison
IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, which matches FLLV's 4.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLLV Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF | 4.73% | 4.71% | 3.25% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 1.41% | 1.40% | 1.31% | 1.55% | 1.44% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
IDLV Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF | 4.71% | 4.63% | 3.41% | 3.59% | 4.69% | 2.99% | 2.30% | 4.92% | 3.94% | 3.05% | 3.92% | 3.93% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDLV and FLLV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDLV has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to FLLV (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs FLLV's -33.95%.
On 5-year performance, FLLV leads with 11.11% vs 5.88% for IDLV. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FLLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FLLV has performed better with a 11.11% return vs 5.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLLV.
FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 4.71% for IDLV.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDLV and 0.29% for FLLV.
FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDLV and FLLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer