PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDLV vs. FLLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDLV vs. FLLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDLV achieves a 2.35% return, which is significantly lower than FLLV's 13.04% return.


IDLV

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.99%
YTD
2.35%
6M
4.22%
1Y
9.36%
3Y*
11.74%
5Y*
5.88%
10Y*
5.12%

FLLV

1D
-0.76%
1M
2.34%
YTD
13.04%
6M
14.26%
1Y
26.92%
3Y*
17.11%
5Y*
11.11%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDLV vs. FLLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
2.35%27.77%2.15%9.18%-12.21%9.76%-9.78%20.09%-8.02%22.01%
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
13.04%15.92%10.70%13.87%-8.54%23.36%12.33%32.72%-2.14%19.66%

Correlation

The correlation between IDLV and FLLV is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.61

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2016

0.61

The correlation between IDLV and FLLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDLV vs. FLLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
IDLV
FLLV

Financial Services

22.9%
13.0%

Industrials

16.4%
9.6%

Real Estate

15.4%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

13.8%
6.1%

Utilities

11.4%
2.6%

Communication Services

8.6%
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

3.8%
11.0%

Energy

3.6%
4.4%

Basic Materials

2.3%
2.7%

Healthcare

1.7%
11.6%

Technology

0.7%
28.8%

Financial Services

IDLV
22.9%
FLLV
13.0%

Industrials

IDLV
16.4%
FLLV
9.6%

Real Estate

IDLV
15.4%
FLLV
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

IDLV
13.8%
FLLV
6.1%

Utilities

IDLV
11.4%
FLLV
2.6%

Communication Services

IDLV
8.6%
FLLV
7.8%

Consumer Cyclical

IDLV
3.8%
FLLV
11.0%

Energy

IDLV
3.6%
FLLV
4.4%

Basic Materials

IDLV
2.3%
FLLV
2.7%

Healthcare

IDLV
1.7%
FLLV
11.6%

Technology

IDLV
0.7%
FLLV
28.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDLV vs. FLLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDLV
IDLV Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
IDLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDLV Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IDLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank

FLLV
FLLV Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FLLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FLLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
FLLV Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
FLLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FLLV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDLV vs. FLLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) and Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IDLVFLLVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.96

3.26

-2.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.41

4.73

-3.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.61

-0.43

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

5.52

-4.27

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.69

20.83

-17.14

IDLV vs. FLLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDLV Sharpe Ratio is 0.96, which is lower than the FLLV Sharpe Ratio of 3.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDLV and FLLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IDLVFLLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

3.26

-2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.84

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.38

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.84

-0.39

Drawdowns

IDLV vs. FLLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDLV drawdown since its inception was -34.65%, roughly equal to the maximum FLLV drawdown of -33.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDLV and FLLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDLVFLLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.65%

-33.95%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.54%

-4.90%

-2.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.97%

-14.01%

+4.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.52%

-18.40%

-4.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.65%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.95%

-0.76%

-5.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.95%

-3.25%

-2.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

1.30%

+1.24%

Volatility

IDLV vs. FLLV - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF (IDLV) has a higher volatility of 2.69% compared to Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF (FLLV) at 2.02%. This indicates that IDLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FLLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDLVFLLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.69%

2.02%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.65%

5.96%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.79%

8.32%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.80%

13.27%

-1.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.40%

15.69%

-2.29%

IDLV vs. FLLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDLV has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than FLLV's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDLV vs. FLLV - Dividend Comparison

IDLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.71%, which matches FLLV's 4.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FLLV
Franklin Liberty U.S. Low Volatility ETF
4.73%4.71%3.25%1.75%1.68%1.41%1.40%1.31%1.55%1.44%0.50%0.00%
IDLV
Invesco S&P International Developed Low Volatility ETF
4.71%4.63%3.41%3.59%4.69%2.99%2.30%4.92%3.94%3.05%3.92%3.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDLV and FLLV have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDLV has higher volatility (2.69%) compared to FLLV (2.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDLV dropped -34.65% vs FLLV's -33.95%.

On 5-year performance, FLLV leads with 11.11% vs 5.88% for IDLV. On fees, IDLV is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FLLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FLLV has performed better with a 11.11% return vs 5.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDLV is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FLLV.

FLLV has the higher dividend yield at 4.73%, compared with 4.71% for IDLV.

They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IDLV and 0.29% for FLLV.

FLLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.26 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDLV and FLLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer