IDGT vs. BCI
IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) and BCI (abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BCI is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDGT returned 12.59%/yr vs 9.82%/yr for BCI. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IDGT charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for BCI.
Performance
IDGT vs. BCI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDGT achieves a 48.60% return, which is significantly higher than BCI's 16.69% return.
IDGT
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 48.60%
- 6M
- 47.03%
- 1Y
- 58.23%
- 3Y*
- 24.83%
- 5Y*
- 12.59%
- 10Y*
- 14.61%
BCI
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- -8.66%
- YTD
- 16.69%
- 6M
- 16.52%
- 1Y
- 22.05%
- 3Y*
- 11.86%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- —
IDGT vs. BCI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 48.60% | 6.79% | 26.71% | -6.09% | -17.90% | 42.14% | 8.78% | 17.39% | -1.97% | 6.89% |
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 16.69% | 15.07% | 5.47% | -8.79% | 15.09% | 26.18% | -2.77% | 7.06% | -11.21% | 3.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDGT and BCI is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2017 | 0.18 |
The correlation between IDGT and BCI shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.18 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDGT vs. BCI — Risk / Return Rank
IDGT
BCI
IDGT vs. BCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDGT | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.24 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.49 | 1.84 | +4.65 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.73 | 6.82 | +11.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDGT vs. BCI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDGT drawdown since its inception was -77.95%, which is greater than BCI's maximum drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDGT and BCI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDGT | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.95% | -32.69% | -45.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.02% | -12.04% | +3.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.74% | -12.04% | -11.70% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.83% | -26.50% | -9.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.96% | -12.04% | +7.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.88% | -11.98% | -7.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.12% | 3.56% | -0.44% |
Volatility
IDGT vs. BCI - Volatility Comparison
iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) has a higher volatility of 9.03% compared to abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF (BCI) at 3.49%. This indicates that IDGT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDGT | BCI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.03% | 3.49% | +5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.48% | 14.94% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.36% | 17.18% | +4.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.34% | 16.79% | +6.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.38% | 15.65% | +7.73% |
IDGT vs. BCI - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDGT has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than BCI's 0.26% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDGT vs. BCI - Dividend Comparison
IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.72%, less than BCI's 14.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCI abrdn Bloomberg All Commodity Strategy K-1 Free ETF | 14.13% | 16.49% | 3.29% | 3.93% | 19.98% | 19.43% | 0.68% | 1.47% | 1.13% | 5.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.72% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDGT and BCI have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDGT has higher volatility (9.03%) compared to BCI (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDGT dropped -77.95% vs BCI's -32.69%.
On 5-year performance, IDGT leads with 12.59% vs 9.82% for BCI. On fees, BCI is cheaper at 0.26% per year. On volatility, BCI has been the lower-risk option at 3.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDGT has performed better with a 12.59% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BCI is cheaper with a 0.26% expense ratio, compared with 0.41% for IDGT.
BCI has the higher dividend yield at 14.13%, compared with 0.72% for IDGT.
IDGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while BCI is Commodities. IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while BCI tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index Total Return. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Aberdeen. Their fees differ too: 0.41% for IDGT and 0.26% for BCI.
IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 1.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDGT and BCI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer