IDGT vs. AIPO
IDGT (iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF) and AIPO (Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index, while AIPO is a Artificial Intelligence fund tracking the MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, IDGT returned 40.38% vs 46.89% for AIPO. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IDGT charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for AIPO.
Performance
IDGT vs. AIPO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDGT achieves a 35.87% return, which is significantly higher than AIPO's 33.86% return.
IDGT
- 1D
- 1.84%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- 32.35%
- YTD
- 35.87%
- 1Y
- 40.38%
- 3Y*
- 22.17%
- 5Y*
- 10.52%
- 10Y*
- 12.50%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.93%
AIPO
- 1D
- 3.42%
- 1M
- -4.58%
- 6M
- 20.17%
- YTD
- 33.86%
- 1Y
- 46.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 45.22%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $42.27M | $38.04M | $47.00M | |
| $4.41M | $4.29M | $8.06M |
IDGT vs. AIPO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 35.87% | -0.21% |
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 33.86% | 9.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDGT and AIPO is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2025 | 0.70 |
The correlation between IDGT and AIPO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDGT vs. AIPO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDGT
AIPO
Technology
Real Estate
Communication Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
IDGT
AIPO
Real Estate
IDGT
AIPO
Communication Services
IDGT
AIPO
Basic Materials
IDGT
-
AIPO
-
Consumer Cyclical
IDGT
-
AIPO
Consumer Defensive
IDGT
-
AIPO
-
Energy
IDGT
-
AIPO
Financial Services
IDGT
-
AIPO
Healthcare
IDGT
-
AIPO
-
Industrials
IDGT
-
AIPO
Utilities
IDGT
-
AIPO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDGT vs. AIPO — Risk / Return Rank
IDGT
AIPO
IDGT vs. AIPO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) and Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDGT | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.22 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | 1.93 | +0.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.83 | 6.41 | +1.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDGT vs. AIPO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDGT drawdown since its inception was -77.95%, which is greater than AIPO's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDGT and AIPO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDGT | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -77.95% | -24.36% | -53.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.93% | -24.36% | +7.43% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.76% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.83% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.88% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.10% | -14.84% | +1.74% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.85% | -5.31% | -14.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.17% | 7.33% | -2.16% |
Volatility
IDGT vs. AIPO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF (IDGT) is 6.90%, while Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF (AIPO) has a volatility of 14.74%. This indicates that IDGT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AIPO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDGT | AIPO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.90% | 14.74% | -7.84% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.77% | 29.87% | -11.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 37.61% | -15.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.49% | 37.27% | -13.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.35% | 37.27% | -13.92% |
IDGT vs. AIPO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDGT has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than AIPO's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDGT vs. AIPO - Dividend Comparison
IDGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.79%, more than AIPO's 0.01% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AIPO Defiance AI & Power Infrastructure ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDGT iShares U.S. Digital Infrastructure and Real Estate ETF | 0.79% | 1.17% | 1.64% | 0.37% | 0.30% | 0.28% | 0.60% | 0.42% | 0.65% | 0.57% | 0.75% | 0.72% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDGT and AIPO have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AIPO has higher volatility (14.74%) compared to IDGT (6.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDGT dropped -77.95% vs AIPO's -24.36%.
On 1-year performance, AIPO leads with 46.89% vs 40.38% for IDGT. On fees, IDGT is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, IDGT has been the lower-risk option at 6.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, AIPO has performed better with a 46.89% return vs 40.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDGT is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for AIPO.
IDGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.01% for AIPO.
IDGT is categorized as Technology Equities, while AIPO is Artificial Intelligence. IDGT tracks S&P Data Center, Tower REIT and Communications Equipment Index, while AIPO tracks MarketVector™ US Listed AI and Power Infrastructure Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for IDGT and 0.69% for AIPO.
IDGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDGT and AIPO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer