IDEV vs. MCSE
IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) and MCSE (Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. IDEV is passively managed, while MCSE is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDEV returned 16.97%/yr vs -0.12%/yr for MCSE. Their 0.75 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. IDEV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for MCSE.
Performance
IDEV vs. MCSE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDEV achieves a 11.37% return, which is significantly higher than MCSE's 1.12% return.
IDEV
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 1.04%
- 6M
- 6.43%
- YTD
- 11.37%
- 1Y
- 25.30%
- 3Y*
- 16.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 9.52%
MCSE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 1.12%
- 1Y
- 4.30%
- 3Y*
- -0.12%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 6.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $135.88M | $124.12M | $125.37M | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
IDEV vs. MCSE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 11.37% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | 9.06% |
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF | 1.12% | 7.79% | -9.46% | 14.86% | 10.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEV and MCSE is 0.47, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2022 | 0.75 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IDEV and MCSE has dropped to 0.47 - well below their long-term average of 0.75, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
IDEV vs. MCSE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDEV
MCSE
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
-
Communication Services
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
IDEV
MCSE
Industrials
IDEV
MCSE
Technology
IDEV
MCSE
Healthcare
IDEV
MCSE
Consumer Cyclical
IDEV
MCSE
Basic Materials
IDEV
MCSE
Consumer Defensive
IDEV
MCSE
Energy
IDEV
MCSE
-
Communication Services
IDEV
MCSE
Utilities
IDEV
MCSE
-
Real Estate
IDEV
MCSE
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEV vs. MCSE — Risk / Return Rank
IDEV
MCSE
IDEV vs. MCSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDEV | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.28 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.10 | +0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.24 | 0.37 | +1.88 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.85 | 0.92 | +7.93 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDEV vs. MCSE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEV drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, which is greater than MCSE's maximum drawdown of -26.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEV and MCSE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEV | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.77% | -26.36% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -10.42% | -0.78% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -26.36% | +12.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.15% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.72% | -10.51% | +9.79% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.47% | -8.79% | +2.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.83% | 4.36% | -1.53% |
Volatility
IDEV vs. MCSE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) has a higher volatility of 4.44% compared to Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF (MCSE) at 0.00%. This indicates that IDEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MCSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEV | MCSE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.44% | 0.00% | +4.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.19% | 1.91% | +11.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.21% | 10.71% | +4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.36% | 19.08% | -2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.25% | 19.08% | -1.83% |
IDEV vs. MCSE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDEV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSE's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDEV vs. MCSE - Dividend Comparison
IDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.18%, less than MCSE's 3.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.18% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% |
MCSE Franklin Sustainable International Equity ETF | 3.74% | 3.78% | 0.63% | 0.57% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDEV and MCSE have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IDEV has higher volatility (4.44%) compared to MCSE (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEV dropped -34.77% vs MCSE's -26.36%.
On 3-year performance, IDEV leads with 16.97% vs -0.12% for MCSE. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, MCSE has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 16.97% return vs -0.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for MCSE.
MCSE has the higher dividend yield at 3.74%, compared with 3.18% for IDEV.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IDEV and 0.59% for MCSE.
IDEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDEV and MCSE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer