IDEV vs. JHID

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) and JHID (John Hancock International High Dividend ETF) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. IDEV is passively managed, while JHID is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, IDEV returned 16.42%/yr vs 19.96%/yr for JHID. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDEV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for JHID.

Performance

IDEV vs. JHID - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEV achieves a 9.99% return, which is significantly lower than JHID's 14.58% return.

IDEV

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -0.49%
• 6M: 6.42%
• YTD: 9.99%
• 1Y: 22.52%
• 3Y*: 16.42%
• 5Y*: 9.36%
• 10Y*: —

JHID

• 1D: -0.44%
• 1M: -0.18%
• 6M: 10.79%
• YTD: 14.58%
• 1Y: 31.71%
• 3Y*: 19.96%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEV vs. JHID - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF	9.99%	32.56%	4.54%	17.36%	0.43%
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF	14.58%	41.47%	3.62%	19.47%	-0.42%

Correlation

The correlation between IDEV and JHID is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 21, 2022	0.94

The correlation between IDEV and JHID has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

IDEV vs. JHID - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IDEV	JHID
Financial Services	24.0%	28.6%
Industrials	18.8%	15.7%
Technology	11.1%	9.6%
Healthcare	8.5%	6.4%
Basic Materials	8.3%	6.6%
Consumer Cyclical	7.7%	4.8%
Consumer Defensive	5.8%	7.9%
Energy	5.4%	6.0%
Communication Services	4.3%	2.8%
Utilities	3.4%	5.8%
Real Estate	2.7%	5.8%

Return for Risk

IDEV vs. JHID — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEV

IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 53
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 57

JHID

JHID Risk / Return Rank: 88
JHID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
JHID Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
JHID Omega Ratio Rank: 89
JHID Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
JHID Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEV vs. JHID - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	IDEV	JHID	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	2.45	-0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.13	3.42	-1.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.44	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.02	3.78	-1.76
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.86	14.44	-6.58

IDEV vs. JHID - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is lower than the JHID Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEV and JHID, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

IDEV vs. JHID - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEV drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, which is greater than JHID's maximum drawdown of -12.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEV and JHID.

Drawdown Indicators

	IDEV	JHID	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.77%	-12.42%	-22.35%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.20%	-8.42%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.41%	-12.42%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.15%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.20%	-0.44%	-0.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.50%	-2.43%	-4.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.87%	2.20%	+0.67%

Volatility

IDEV vs. JHID - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to John Hancock International High Dividend ETF (JHID) at 3.19%. This indicates that IDEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JHID based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IDEV	JHID	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.66%	3.19%	+0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.97%	11.09%	+1.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.10%	13.03%	+2.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.34%	13.90%	+2.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.25%	13.90%	+3.35%

IDEV vs. JHID - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than JHID's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

IDEV vs. JHID - Dividend Comparison

IDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.21%, less than JHID's 3.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF	3.21%	3.40%	3.30%	3.07%	2.69%	3.05%	2.00%	3.18%	3.16%	1.54%
JHID John Hancock International High Dividend ETF	3.42%	3.13%	5.15%	5.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IDEV and JHID in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, IDEV and JHID move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, IDEV or JHID?

IDEV has higher volatility (3.66%) compared to JHID (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEV dropped -34.77% vs JHID's -12.42%.

Which ETF is better, IDEV or JHID?

On 3-year performance, JHID leads with 19.96% vs 16.42% for IDEV. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, JHID has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, IDEV or JHID?

Over the 3-year period, JHID has performed better with a 19.96% return vs 16.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, IDEV or JHID?

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for JHID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, IDEV or JHID?

JHID has the higher dividend yield at 3.42%, compared with 3.21% for IDEV.

What is the main difference between IDEV and JHID?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and John Hancock. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IDEV and 0.46% for JHID.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JHID currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.