IDEV vs. IWM
IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) and IWM (iShares Russell 2000 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDEV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index, while IWM is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 2000 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDEV returned 8.88%/yr vs 6.49%/yr for IWM. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDEV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for IWM.
Performance
IDEV vs. IWM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDEV achieves a 9.92% return, which is significantly lower than IWM's 18.69% return.
IDEV
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 2.82%
- YTD
- 9.92%
- 6M
- 13.26%
- 1Y
- 23.41%
- 3Y*
- 17.76%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- —
IWM
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 4.43%
- YTD
- 18.69%
- 6M
- 19.57%
- 1Y
- 43.31%
- 3Y*
- 18.42%
- 5Y*
- 6.49%
- 10Y*
- 11.08%
IDEV vs. IWM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 9.92% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | -14.99% | 13.00% | 8.32% | 23.12% | -14.10% | 17.29% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 18.69% | 12.66% | 11.38% | 16.83% | -20.48% | 14.54% | 20.03% | 25.39% | -11.12% | 14.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEV and IWM is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017 | 0.73 |
The correlation between IDEV and IWM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDEV vs. IWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDEV
IWM
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IDEV
IWM
Industrials
IDEV
IWM
Technology
IDEV
IWM
Healthcare
IDEV
IWM
Basic Materials
IDEV
IWM
Consumer Cyclical
IDEV
IWM
Consumer Defensive
IDEV
IWM
Energy
IDEV
IWM
Communication Services
IDEV
IWM
Utilities
IDEV
IWM
Real Estate
IDEV
IWM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEV vs. IWM — Risk / Return Rank
IDEV
IWM
IDEV vs. IWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDEV | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.62 | 2.27 | -0.65 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.31 | 3.12 | -0.81 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.37 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 3.97 | -1.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.73 | 14.12 | -5.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDEV | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.62 | 2.27 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.29 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.37 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
IDEV vs. IWM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEV drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, smaller than the maximum IWM drawdown of -59.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEV and IWM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEV | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.77% | -59.05% | +24.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -11.03% | -0.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -27.50% | +14.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.15% | -31.91% | +2.76% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.13% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.08% | -0.13% | +0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.57% | -10.77% | +4.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.85% | 3.10% | -0.25% |
Volatility
IDEV vs. IWM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) is 4.71%, while iShares Russell 2000 ETF (IWM) has a volatility of 5.56%. This indicates that IDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEV | IWM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.71% | 5.56% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.07% | 13.52% | -1.45% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.52% | 19.14% | -4.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.26% | 22.52% | -6.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.27% | 23.04% | -5.77% |
IDEV vs. IWM - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDEV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IWM's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IDEV vs. IWM - Dividend Comparison
IDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than IWM's 0.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.10% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IWM iShares Russell 2000 ETF | 0.87% | 1.04% | 1.15% | 1.35% | 1.48% | 0.94% | 1.04% | 1.26% | 1.40% | 1.26% | 1.38% | 1.54% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDEV and IWM have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IWM has higher volatility (5.56%) compared to IDEV (4.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEV dropped -34.77% vs IWM's -59.05%.
On 5-year performance, IDEV leads with 8.88% vs 6.49% for IWM. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 6.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for IWM.
IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.10%, compared with 0.87% for IWM.
IDEV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IWM is Small Cap Blend Equities. IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index, while IWM tracks Russell 2000 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IDEV and 0.19% for IWM.
IWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.27 vs 1.62), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDEV and IWM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer