IDEV vs. IEMG
IDEV (iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF) and IEMG (iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDEV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index, while IEMG is a Emerging Markets Diversified fund tracking the MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IDEV returned 8.22%/yr vs 6.57%/yr for IEMG. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IDEV charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for IEMG.
Performance
IDEV vs. IEMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDEV achieves a 7.53% return, which is significantly lower than IEMG's 18.97% return.
IDEV
- 1D
- 0.52%
- 1M
- -1.13%
- YTD
- 7.53%
- 6M
- 10.04%
- 1Y
- 20.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 8.22%
- 10Y*
- —
IEMG
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- -3.66%
- YTD
- 18.97%
- 6M
- 20.80%
- 1Y
- 40.80%
- 3Y*
- 20.51%
- 5Y*
- 6.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
IDEV vs. IEMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 7.53% | 32.56% | 4.54% | 17.36% | -14.99% | 13.00% | 8.32% | 23.12% | -14.10% | 17.29% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 18.97% | 32.56% | 6.50% | 11.52% | -19.98% | -0.64% | 17.87% | 17.81% | -14.92% | 21.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEV and IEMG is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 2017 | 0.77 |
The correlation between IDEV and IEMG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.
IDEV vs. IEMG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IDEV
IEMG
Financial Services
Industrials
Technology
Healthcare
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Utilities
Real Estate
Financial Services
IDEV
IEMG
Industrials
IDEV
IEMG
Technology
IDEV
IEMG
Healthcare
IDEV
IEMG
Basic Materials
IDEV
IEMG
Consumer Cyclical
IDEV
IEMG
Consumer Defensive
IDEV
IEMG
Energy
IDEV
IEMG
Communication Services
IDEV
IEMG
Utilities
IDEV
IEMG
Real Estate
IDEV
IEMG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEV vs. IEMG — Risk / Return Rank
IDEV
IEMG
IDEV vs. IEMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IDEV | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.38 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.87 | 3.10 | -1.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.31 | 11.68 | -4.38 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IDEV | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.42 | 1.99 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.35 | +0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.49 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.54 | 0.33 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
IDEV vs. IEMG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEV drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, smaller than the maximum IEMG drawdown of -38.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEV and IEMG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEV | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.77% | -38.71% | +3.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.20% | -13.21% | +2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.41% | -17.21% | +3.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.15% | -35.75% | +6.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -38.71% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -7.00% | +4.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -12.97% | +6.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.86% | 3.50% | -0.64% |
Volatility
IDEV vs. IEMG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) is 4.42%, while iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF (IEMG) has a volatility of 10.33%. This indicates that IDEV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IEMG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEV | IEMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 10.33% | -5.91% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.41% | 18.35% | -5.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.78% | 20.62% | -5.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.30% | 18.62% | -2.32% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.28% | 20.14% | -2.86% |
IDEV vs. IEMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDEV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IEMG's 0.09% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
IDEV vs. IEMG - Dividend Comparison
IDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.17%, more than IEMG's 2.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEV iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF | 3.17% | 3.40% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 2.69% | 3.05% | 2.00% | 3.18% | 3.16% | 1.54% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IEMG iShares Core MSCI Emerging Markets ETF | 2.31% | 2.75% | 3.20% | 2.89% | 2.71% | 3.06% | 1.87% | 3.15% | 2.76% | 2.35% | 2.28% | 2.53% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDEV and IEMG have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IEMG has higher volatility (10.33%) compared to IDEV (4.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEV dropped -34.77% vs IEMG's -38.71%.
On 5-year performance, IDEV leads with 8.22% vs 6.57% for IEMG. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IDEV has been the lower-risk option at 4.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 8.22% return vs 6.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for IEMG.
IDEV has the higher dividend yield at 3.17%, compared with 2.31% for IEMG.
IDEV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IEMG is Emerging Markets Diversified. IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index, while IEMG tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Investable Market Index (USD) (Net). Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IDEV and 0.09% for IEMG.
IEMG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for IDEV and IEMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer