PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEV vs. IBIC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEV vs. IBIC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEV achieves a 8.34% return, which is significantly higher than IBIC's 2.43% return.


IDEV

1D
-1.85%
1M
-0.30%
YTD
8.34%
6M
7.88%
1Y
23.11%
3Y*
17.47%
5Y*
8.59%
10Y*

IBIC

1D
0.04%
1M
0.12%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.57%
1Y
4.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEV vs. IBIC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
8.34%32.56%4.54%6.47%
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
2.43%4.96%5.25%2.17%

Correlation

The correlation between IDEV and IBIC is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2023

0.04

The correlation between IDEV and IBIC shifts across timeframes, from -0.19 (1 year) to 0.04 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEV vs. IBIC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEV
IDEV Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IDEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDEV Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
IDEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDEV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

IBIC
IBIC Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
IBIC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBIC Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBIC Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
IBIC Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBIC Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEV vs. IBIC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) and iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDEVIBICDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-6.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

2.22

-0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.07

16.56

-14.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.10

58.67

-50.57

IDEV vs. IBIC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IDEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is lower than the IBIC Sharpe Ratio of 4.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IDEV and IBIC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDEV vs. IBIC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEV drawdown since its inception was -34.77%, which is greater than IBIC's maximum drawdown of -0.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEV and IBIC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDEVIBICDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.77%

-0.90%

-33.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.20%

-0.27%

-10.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.15%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

-0.08%

-1.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.53%

-0.10%

-6.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.86%

0.08%

+2.78%

Volatility

IDEV vs. IBIC - Volatility Comparison

iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF (IDEV) has a higher volatility of 5.07% compared to iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF (IBIC) at 0.17%. This indicates that IDEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDEVIBICDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.07%

0.17%

+4.90%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.83%

0.67%

+12.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.07%

0.89%

+14.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.35%

1.56%

+14.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.28%

1.56%

+15.72%

IDEV vs. IBIC - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEV has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than IBIC's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IDEV vs. IBIC - Dividend Comparison

IDEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.26%, less than IBIC's 3.58% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
IBIC
iShares iBonds Oct 2026 Term TIPS ETF
3.58%4.43%4.65%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IDEV
iShares Core MSCI International Developed Markets ETF
3.26%3.40%3.30%3.07%2.69%3.05%2.00%3.18%3.16%1.54%

Frequently Asked Questions


IDEV and IBIC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IDEV has higher volatility (5.07%) compared to IBIC (0.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IDEV dropped -34.77% vs IBIC's -0.90%.

On 1-year performance, IDEV leads with 23.11% vs 4.42% for IBIC. On fees, IDEV is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, IBIC has been the lower-risk option at 0.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, IDEV has performed better with a 23.11% return vs 4.42%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IDEV is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC has the higher dividend yield at 3.58%, compared with 3.26% for IDEV.

IDEV is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IBIC is Inflation-Protected Bonds. IDEV tracks MSCI World ex USA Investable Market Index, while IBIC tracks ICE 2026 Maturity US Inflation-Linked Treasury Index. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for IDEV and 0.10% for IBIC.

IBIC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.99 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEV and IBIC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer