IDEQ vs. QTUM
IDEQ (Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Lazard, while QTUM is a Technology Equities fund tracking the BlueStar Machine Learning and Quantum Computing Index. IDEQ is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.40% expense ratio.
Performance
IDEQ vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDEQ achieves a 16.51% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 47.39% return.
IDEQ
- 1D
- 0.28%
- 1M
- 1.06%
- YTD
- 16.51%
- 6M
- 19.27%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QTUM
- 1D
- 1.22%
- 1M
- 9.88%
- YTD
- 47.39%
- 6M
- 45.72%
- 1Y
- 82.93%
- 3Y*
- 48.15%
- 5Y*
- 28.09%
- 10Y*
- —
IDEQ vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF | 16.51% | 12.10% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 47.39% | 14.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEQ and QTUM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.70 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEQ vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank
IDEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QTUM
IDEQ vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDEQ | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 5.46 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 19.77 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDEQ vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEQ and QTUM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEQ | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -38.45% | +25.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.39% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.45% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.01% | -4.42% | +3.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -8.24% | +6.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.21% | — |
Volatility
IDEQ vs. QTUM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEQ | QTUM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 14.18% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 23.17% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.28% | 28.39% | -9.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 26.99% | -7.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 27.40% | -8.12% |
IDEQ vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IDEQ and QTUM have an expense ratio of 0.40%.
Dividends
IDEQ vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison
IDEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than QTUM's 0.73% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF | 0.52% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF | 0.73% | 1.01% | 0.61% | 0.81% | 1.46% | 0.48% | 0.42% | 0.61% | 0.21% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDEQ and QTUM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDEQ and QTUM have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.
QTUM has the higher dividend yield at 0.73%, compared with 0.52% for IDEQ.
IDEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while QTUM is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Defiance.
Find the right allocation for IDEQ and QTUM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer