IDEQ vs. IDMO
IDEQ (Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF) and IDMO (Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IDEQ is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Lazard, while IDMO is a Momentum fund tracking the S&P Momentum Developed ex U.S. & South Korea LargeMidCap Index. IDEQ is actively managed, while IDMO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IDEQ charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IDMO.
Performance
IDEQ vs. IDMO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IDEQ achieves a 15.58% return, which is significantly higher than IDMO's 9.69% return.
IDEQ
- 1D
- -3.09%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 15.58%
- 6M
- 15.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IDMO
- 1D
- -2.67%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- YTD
- 9.69%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 26.34%
- 3Y*
- 26.46%
- 5Y*
- 15.55%
- 10Y*
- 13.51%
IDEQ vs. IDMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF | 15.58% | 12.10% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 9.69% | 7.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between IDEQ and IDMO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IDEQ vs. IDMO — Risk / Return Rank
IDEQ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
IDMO
IDEQ vs. IDMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) and Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF (IDMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IDEQ | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.15 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.70 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IDEQ vs. IDMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IDEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, smaller than the maximum IDMO drawdown of -39.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEQ and IDMO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IDEQ | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.95% | -39.38% | +26.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -12.31% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.65% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.07% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.34% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.09% | -2.67% | -0.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.07% | -9.73% | +7.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 3.03% | — |
Volatility
IDEQ vs. IDMO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IDEQ | IDMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.84% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 16.34% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.48% | 18.13% | +1.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 18.09% | +1.39% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 17.95% | +1.53% |
IDEQ vs. IDMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
IDEQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than IDMO's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IDEQ vs. IDMO - Dividend Comparison
IDEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%, less than IDMO's 3.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDEQ Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF | 1.34% | 0.60% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IDMO Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF | 3.64% | 3.71% | 2.24% | 2.89% | 3.66% | 1.81% | 1.63% | 2.78% | 3.27% | 3.08% | 2.18% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IDEQ and IDMO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IDMO is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IDMO is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IDEQ.
IDMO has the higher dividend yield at 3.64%, compared with 1.34% for IDEQ.
IDEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while IDMO is Momentum. They also come from different issuers: Lazard and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDEQ and 0.25% for IDMO.
Find the right allocation for IDEQ and IDMO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer