PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IDEQ vs. FMTM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IDEQ vs. FMTM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IDEQ achieves a 16.51% return, which is significantly lower than FMTM's 28.93% return.


IDEQ

1D
0.28%
1M
1.06%
YTD
16.51%
6M
19.27%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FMTM

1D
0.84%
1M
-0.20%
YTD
28.93%
6M
30.60%
1Y
60.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IDEQ vs. FMTM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between IDEQ and FMTM is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 29, 2025

0.70

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IDEQ vs. FMTM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IDEQ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


FMTM
FMTM Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FMTM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FMTM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FMTM Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FMTM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FMTM Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IDEQ vs. FMTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lazard International Dynamic Equity ETF (IDEQ) and MarketDesk Focused U.S. Momentum ETF (FMTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IDEQFMTMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.05

IDEQ vs. FMTM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IDEQ vs. FMTM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IDEQ drawdown since its inception was -12.95%, which is greater than FMTM's maximum drawdown of -12.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IDEQ and FMTM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IDEQFMTMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.95%

-12.12%

-0.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.01%

-2.13%

+1.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-1.92%

-0.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.16%

Volatility

IDEQ vs. FMTM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IDEQFMTMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.28%

23.67%

-4.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.28%

23.40%

-4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.28%

23.40%

-4.12%

IDEQ vs. FMTM - Expense Ratio Comparison

IDEQ has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than FMTM's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

IDEQ vs. FMTM - Dividend Comparison

IDEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, more than FMTM's 0.23% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


IDEQ and FMTM have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IDEQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IDEQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for FMTM.

IDEQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.52%, compared with 0.23% for FMTM.

IDEQ is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while FMTM is Momentum. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IDEQ and 0.45% for FMTM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IDEQ and FMTM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer